Some video shooters lazy and cheap

Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
>
> John Turco wrote:
> > Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
> >> John Turco wrote:
> >> > Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
>
> >> >> Hmmm. Not knowing your location and not being an expert at law
>
> >> > Pay attention, Wolfgang. Observe Paul Heslop's e-mail address:
>
> >> > paul.heslop DeleteThis @blueyonder.co.uk
>
> >> So? Anyone can buy a .co.uk domain.
> >> http://www.nic.uk/registrants/aboutdomainnames/rules/
> >> And anyone who has a domain can offer email services toanyone in
> >> the world.
>
> > Paul Heslop, himself, has publicly stated that he's in Britain.
>
> And I am required to recieve and remember everything Paul has
> ever stated in public?

You're not "required to recieve (sic) and remember" anything.

> > Are you calling him a liar, by any chance?
>
> I am calling you an idiot by claiming indirectly to read that out
> of his email provider's domain. And you surely have the message
> ID ... because I don't have to trust you to report correctly.

Your limited powers of observation don't concern me.

> >> > You see, the "uk" part stands for "United Kingdom" (as in, the
> >> > "United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland").
>
> >> Did you know that there are different areas with different laws
> >> in the UK --- not to mention NI? No?
>
> > So?
>
> So for the Turco amongst us, even knowing that he is in the UK
> wouldn't tell me which laws apply. Clear?
>
> -Wolfgang

My point remains that, you carelessly overlooked the country domain
in question ("uk").

Hence, those "laws" are of no relevance, whatsoever.

--
Cordially,
John Turco

Marie's Musings <http://fairiesandtails.blogspot.com>

Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
>
> John Turco wrote:

<heavily edited for brevity>

> > My point remains that, you carelessly overlooked the country
> > domain in question ("uk").
>
> To repeat it for the slow students among us, that is,
> specially for you:
> A N Y O N E C A N B U Y A " U K " D O M A I N.
> Even me, who isn't in the UK. Do you really need me to prove
> that to you?
>
> > Hence, those "laws" are of no relevance, whatsoever.
>
> The UK is a *united* kingdom. Florida's laws don't have
> anything to do with Oregon's laws, you know? Same with the
> parts that make up the UK.
>
> -Wolfgang


You refuse to admit your mistake(s), as usual.

--
Cordially,
John Turco

Marie's Musings <http://fairiesandtails.blogspot.com>