need to be sharpened?

Bill Tuthill <ccreekin.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Floyd L. Davidson <floyd.DeleteThis@apaflo.com> wrote:
>>
>> USM is not sharpening. To some degree the visual results
>> are similar. But far fewer images are improved with USM
>> than with sharpening.
>
>Which sharpening algorithm do you say produces better results than USM?
>Convolution sharpening? High pass filter?

It's not a case of "produces better results", just
different results...

>> With USM yes, but not with sharpening, which has different
>> effects when over done..
>
>Most advocates of heavy USM are not looking closely at their images.
>Perhaps they are old folks who are to vain to wear reading glasses.

--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd.DeleteThis@apaflo.com