 |
|
|
|
Next: Getting White right
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: May 03, 2006
Posts: 114
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:32 am
Post subject: what's the best lens for my purposes???
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs. i
believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens have
as little distortion as possible
should i get ,,,
1...50mm only
2...85mm only
3...55mm-200mm zoom
4...24mm - 85mm zoom
5...18mm - 55mm zoom
these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my setup,
i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger paintings.
and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am concerned
about distortion.
the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with the
idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will have
absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: May 03, 2006
Posts: 114
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:13 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
to be more specific about the artwork.....
they are oils. i use lamp and camera polarizers with
zero glare. the oils range from small(8x8) to 40x50. i HAVE TO shoot
in my studio, which is about 12x17. most of my artwork is no bigger
than about 23x27, but i do an occasional 30x40. i can get back
approximately 5 or 6 feet with my camera to shoot. this will accomodate
a 23x27 or there abouts, no problem. i can only shoot my artwork on the
width of the room. if i were to try setting up along it's length, the
lamps would be too close and not at a great angle.
i have been using a canon g3. at 300dpi, i can get a 5" width image. up
until now, i have been using those images for my galleries to print
invites,,,,,,a perfect size. but i have recently faced situations
where clearly it's time to move up to the 8mp range camera(8 in fact
barely gets what i need). the printers are starting to ask for 350dpi,
and the magazines are asking for larger images for full page spreads.
this makes my 4mp obsolete.
i want a dslr because i have always felt my images were lacking in
really good sharpness. manual focus on the g3 is pathetic...i would
also like a split screen focus because my eyes see the focus much
better with a split screen than than a prism.
i'm looking at the rebel xt because of the price, which is great for
the next step up.
randy: you're saying a 35mm on a digital is equivalent to a 50mm
standard slr. so then my concern about image distortion on a 50mm dslr
is erroneous....that there will be no distortion. i can get a
rebel/18-55mm. that would cover the 35mm-55mm range.
dennis/frederick: i think also part of the reason is simply my desire
for the manual focus. as i stated, i feel my images have been lacking
sharpness, maybe on an insignificant level, but it has always bothered
me nonetheless. do you think maybe the lens on the g3 was lacking, and
that the zeiss or leica lenses will make up it?
bugbear: what kind of software are you talking about that'll correct
distortion?
after what you all have said, i started looking around, and the sony
and panasonic look ok too. same price as the rebel, and the sony offers
a 10mp, but the panasonic offers 8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 03, 2005
Posts: 426
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:55 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
bruin70 DeleteThis @mail.com wrote:
: i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
: camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs. i
: believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
: convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens have
: as little distortion as possible
A few problems with your simple question that you may not realize. Digital
SLRs have a sensor that is not (except for a very few very high priced
units) the same dimension as a frame of 35mm film. So the digital image is
cropped from what a 35mm film image would be with the same lens. This crop
is generally (and somewhat erroneously) called a magnification factor. I
don't know what this factor would be for your particular target camera but
with my Pentax camera the factor is 1.5x. This means that a 50mm lens on
my camera would give the angle of view of a 75mm lens on a 35mm film
camera. Thus if you recognize that the "standard" 50mm lens as the
dividing line between wide and tele, to get the same image with my DSLR
would require a 33 1/3mm lens. This will definately effect the next part
of your question. As to 50mm being a tiny bit wide, there is no hard and
fast number that is THE divider. If there is one it may be 50.12696 or
some such number that isn't real practical. The difference is so slight
that outside of extreme scientific useage, it makes no noticable
difference.
: should i get ,,,
: 1...50mm only
: 2...85mm only
: 3...55mm-200mm zoom
: 4...24mm - 85mm zoom
: 5...18mm - 55mm zoom
: these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
: be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my setup,
: i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger paintings.
: and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am concerned
: about distortion.
: the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
: if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
: 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with the
: idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will have
: absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
: thanks
Due to the crop factor I would suggest that you try the the 18-55mm zoom.
This lens would include the approximate correct lens length. In general
if the horizontal field of view is 40 degrees (rounded to the nearest
full degree) this should be the correct lens.
Hope this info helps.
Randy
==========
Randy Berbaum
Champaign, IL >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 01, 2006
Posts: 525
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:58 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I have done art work photography professionally for 30 years.
Even with 35mm the best lens for shooting artwork is a macro lens, more
because the have a flat field rather than a curved field of normal
lenses. You want a DSLR (Canon 30D or Nikon D200 would be you best
bets) and a 50-60 mm macro. The 50 Sigma would be ideal, since it is a
little shorter than the 55 or 60 macros Nikon and Canon have and you
have a constrained space, these would also work with 35mm, no worry of
distortion with a macro. With a quality camera (as I listed) auto focus
should be no problem, getting a split image screen is a little bit of a
hassle but they are available, saddly not from the camera
manufacturers.
Lighting is also an issue, polarized lighting is the best to use. Buy a
couple of Lowel Totalights and work from there.
If you want to do professional work you need a DSLR, small sensor
digicams aren't going to hack it if you are submitting to magazines.
Also a good macro lens is the only way to go when shooting, a long
telephoto (150-200mm) also works but it doesn't sound like an option in
your space.
Tom >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 06, 2006
Posts: 363
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:55 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Randy Berbaum wrote:
> bruin70.TakeThisOut@mail.com wrote:
>> i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
>> camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs.
>> i believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
>> convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens
>> have as little distortion as possible
>
> A few problems with your simple question that you may not realize.
> Digital SLRs have a sensor that is not (except for a very few very
> high priced units) the same dimension as a frame of 35mm film. So the
> digital image is cropped from what a 35mm film image would be with
> the same lens. This crop is generally (and somewhat erroneously)
> called a magnification factor. I don't know what this factor would be
> for your particular target camera but with my Pentax camera the
> factor is 1.5x. This means that a 50mm lens on my camera would give
> the angle of view of a 75mm lens on a 35mm film camera. Thus if you
> recognize that the "standard" 50mm lens as the dividing line between
> wide and tele, to get the same image with my DSLR would require a 33
> 1/3mm lens. This will definately effect the next part of your
> question. As to 50mm being a tiny bit wide, there is no hard and fast
> number that is THE divider. If there is one it may be 50.12696 or
> some such number that isn't real practical. The difference is so
> slight that outside of extreme scientific useage, it makes no
> noticable difference.
>
>> should i get ,,,
>> 1...50mm only
>> 2...85mm only
>> 3...55mm-200mm zoom
>> 4...24mm - 85mm zoom
>> 5...18mm - 55mm zoom
>
>> these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
>> be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my
>> setup, i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger
>> paintings. and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am
>> concerned about distortion.
>
>> the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
>
>> if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
>> 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with
>> the idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will
>> have absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
>
>> thanks
>
> Due to the crop factor I would suggest that you try the the 18-55mm
> zoom. This lens would include the approximate correct lens length. In
> general if the horizontal field of view is 40 degrees (rounded to the
> nearest full degree) this should be the correct lens.
>
> Hope this info helps.
>
> Randy
>
> ==========
> Randy Berbaum
> Champaign, IL
To buy a digital SLR just to shoot artwork would be like throwing money down
the drain.
Buy a zoom-lens digital with all the bells and whistles, such as the
Panasonic FZ30, and it won't matter what focal length you decide to shoot
at. >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 364
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:55 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dennis Pogson wrote:
> Randy Berbaum wrote:
>> bruin70 RemoveThis @mail.com wrote:
>>> i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
>>> camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs.
>>> i believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
>>> convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens
>>> have as little distortion as possible
>> A few problems with your simple question that you may not realize.
>> Digital SLRs have a sensor that is not (except for a very few very
>> high priced units) the same dimension as a frame of 35mm film. So the
>> digital image is cropped from what a 35mm film image would be with
>> the same lens. This crop is generally (and somewhat erroneously)
>> called a magnification factor. I don't know what this factor would be
>> for your particular target camera but with my Pentax camera the
>> factor is 1.5x. This means that a 50mm lens on my camera would give
>> the angle of view of a 75mm lens on a 35mm film camera. Thus if you
>> recognize that the "standard" 50mm lens as the dividing line between
>> wide and tele, to get the same image with my DSLR would require a 33
>> 1/3mm lens. This will definately effect the next part of your
>> question. As to 50mm being a tiny bit wide, there is no hard and fast
>> number that is THE divider. If there is one it may be 50.12696 or
>> some such number that isn't real practical. The difference is so
>> slight that outside of extreme scientific useage, it makes no
>> noticable difference.
>>
>>> should i get ,,,
>>> 1...50mm only
>>> 2...85mm only
>>> 3...55mm-200mm zoom
>>> 4...24mm - 85mm zoom
>>> 5...18mm - 55mm zoom
>>> these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
>>> be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my
>>> setup, i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger
>>> paintings. and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am
>>> concerned about distortion.
>>> the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
>>> if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
>>> 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with
>>> the idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will
>>> have absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
>>> thanks
>> Due to the crop factor I would suggest that you try the the 18-55mm
>> zoom. This lens would include the approximate correct lens length. In
>> general if the horizontal field of view is 40 degrees (rounded to the
>> nearest full degree) this should be the correct lens.
>>
>> Hope this info helps.
>>
>> Randy
>>
>> ==========
>> Randy Berbaum
>> Champaign, IL
>
> To buy a digital SLR just to shoot artwork would be like throwing money down
> the drain.
>
> Buy a zoom-lens digital with all the bells and whistles, such as the
> Panasonic FZ30, and it won't matter what focal length you decide to shoot
> at.
>
>
I sort of agree. If the pixel-level sharpness of a dslr - and extremely
low distortion when using the right lens (such as an expensive macro
lens or a cheap $99 50mm f1.8 af-d nikkor) isn't needed, then a compact
camera would be fine.
Download PTlens, and check that the camera is supported. The FZ30 is -
it has a lot of distortion at both ends of the zoom range, very little
mid-range - all correctable with one click and a $10 "freeware" donation. >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 379
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:55 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
bruin70 RemoveThis @mail.com wrote:
>
> if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
> 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with the
> idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will have
> absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
No need to worry about distortion; in the modern
age of cheap, powerful computers, it is moderately
simple to calibrate and correct, either
with free or commercial software.
BugBear >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 20, 2005
Posts: 546
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:55 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
bruin70 DeleteThis @mail.com wrote:
> i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
> camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs. i
> believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
> convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens
> have as little distortion as possible
>
> should i get ,,,
> 1...50mm only
> 2...85mm only
> 3...55mm-200mm zoom
> 4...24mm - 85mm zoom
> 5...18mm - 55mm zoom
>
> these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
> be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my setup,
> i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger paintings.
> and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am concerned
> about distortion.
>
> the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
>
> if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
> 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with the
> idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will have
> absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
>
> thanks
Not enough information. Artwork can me a lot of different things.
Access to the work may vary greatly as well as lighting etc.
Since we would have to guess each of us may be making suggestions based
on our own idea of what artwork means.
Tell us some more about your subjects, lighting and access.
--
Joseph Meehan
Dia duit >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 20, 2005
Posts: 546
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:55 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Randy Berbaum wrote:
> bruin70.RemoveThis@mail.com wrote:
>> i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
>> camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs.
>> i believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
>> convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens
>> have as little distortion as possible
>
> A few problems with your simple question that you may not realize.
> Digital SLRs have a sensor that is not (except for a very few very
> high priced units) the same dimension as a frame of 35mm film. So the
> digital image is cropped from what a 35mm film image would be with
> the same lens. This crop is generally (and somewhat erroneously)
> called a magnification factor. I don't know what this factor would be
> for your particular target camera but with my Pentax camera the
> factor is 1.5x. This means that a 50mm lens on my camera would give
> the angle of view of a 75mm lens on a 35mm film camera. Thus if you
> recognize that the "standard" 50mm lens as the dividing line between
> wide and tele, to get the same image with my DSLR would require a 33
> 1/3mm lens. This will definately effect the next part of your
> question. As to 50mm being a tiny bit wide, there is no hard and fast
> number that is THE divider. If there is one it may be 50.12696 or
> some such number that isn't real practical. The difference is so
> slight that outside of extreme scientific useage, it makes no
> noticable difference.
>
>> should i get ,,,
>> 1...50mm only
>> 2...85mm only
>> 3...55mm-200mm zoom
>> 4...24mm - 85mm zoom
>> 5...18mm - 55mm zoom
>
>> these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
>> be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my
>> setup, i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger
>> paintings. and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am
>> concerned about distortion.
>
>> the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
>
>> if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
>> 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with
>> the idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will
>> have absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
>
>> thanks
>
> Due to the crop factor I would suggest that you try the the 18-55mm
> zoom. This lens would include the approximate correct lens length. In
> general if the horizontal field of view is 40 degrees (rounded to the
> nearest full degree) this should be the correct lens.
>
> Hope this info helps.
>
> Randy
>
> ==========
> Randy Berbaum
> Champaign, IL
I failed to add also tell us about what kind of results you want. Are
you interested in trying to print out results that look as much like the
original as possible to hang on your wall, or are you looking for something
to help you remember what you saw. How about details? If there is some
smaller portion of the art that you may want to get a close up of, you may
want more telephoto and/or macro capability. How about lighting? Tripod
use?
--
Joseph Meehan
Dia duit >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 437
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:50 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
bruin70.RemoveThis@mail.com wrote:
> i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
> camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs. i
> believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
> convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens have
> as little distortion as possible
>
> should i get ,,,
> 1...50mm only
> 2...85mm only
> 3...55mm-200mm zoom
> 4...24mm - 85mm zoom
> 5...18mm - 55mm zoom
>
> these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
> be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my setup,
> i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger paintings.
> and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am concerned
> about distortion.
>
> the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
>
> if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
> 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with the
> idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will have
> absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
Your post is very confusing. You say that you have limited space and need
to get close but you at the same time say that you have no need for a
"wide", which is in fact _exactly_ what you need if you don't have much
space.
Why don't you try telling us what you are trying to shoot (including its
dimensions) and how much space you have to work in and what kind of budget
you have and what you intend to do with the resulting photos and maybe
someone will be in a better position to help you.
>
> thanks
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 437
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:51 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dennis Pogson wrote:
> Randy Berbaum wrote:
>> bruin70 RemoveThis @mail.com wrote:
>>> i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
>>> camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs.
>>> i believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
>>> convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens
>>> have as little distortion as possible
>>
>> A few problems with your simple question that you may not realize.
>> Digital SLRs have a sensor that is not (except for a very few very
>> high priced units) the same dimension as a frame of 35mm film. So the
>> digital image is cropped from what a 35mm film image would be with
>> the same lens. This crop is generally (and somewhat erroneously)
>> called a magnification factor. I don't know what this factor would be
>> for your particular target camera but with my Pentax camera the
>> factor is 1.5x. This means that a 50mm lens on my camera would give
>> the angle of view of a 75mm lens on a 35mm film camera. Thus if you
>> recognize that the "standard" 50mm lens as the dividing line between
>> wide and tele, to get the same image with my DSLR would require a 33
>> 1/3mm lens. This will definately effect the next part of your
>> question. As to 50mm being a tiny bit wide, there is no hard and fast
>> number that is THE divider. If there is one it may be 50.12696 or
>> some such number that isn't real practical. The difference is so
>> slight that outside of extreme scientific useage, it makes no
>> noticable difference.
>>
>>> should i get ,,,
>>> 1...50mm only
>>> 2...85mm only
>>> 3...55mm-200mm zoom
>>> 4...24mm - 85mm zoom
>>> 5...18mm - 55mm zoom
>>
>>> these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
>>> be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my
>>> setup, i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger
>>> paintings. and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am
>>> concerned about distortion.
>>
>>> the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
>>
>>> if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
>>> 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with
>>> the idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will
>>> have absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
>>
>>> thanks
>>
>> Due to the crop factor I would suggest that you try the the 18-55mm
>> zoom. This lens would include the approximate correct lens length. In
>> general if the horizontal field of view is 40 degrees (rounded to the
>> nearest full degree) this should be the correct lens.
>>
>> Hope this info helps.
>>
>> Randy
>>
>> ==========
>> Randy Berbaum
>> Champaign, IL
>
> To buy a digital SLR just to shoot artwork would be like throwing money
> down the drain.
>
> Buy a zoom-lens digital with all the bells and whistles, such as the
> Panasonic FZ30, and it won't matter what focal length you decide to shoot
> at.
Of course it will--what are the distortion figures for the FZ? Or are you
going to propose the standard "fix it in Photoshop" response that costs
resolution?
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 437
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:45 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 04, 2006
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:48 am
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<bruin70.TakeThisOut@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1154680357.469939.292620@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
> camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs. i
> believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
> convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens have
> as little distortion as possible
>
> should i get ,,,
> 1...50mm only
> 2...85mm only
> 3...55mm-200mm zoom
> 4...24mm - 85mm zoom
> 5...18mm - 55mm zoom
>
> these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
> be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my setup,
> i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger paintings.
> and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am concerned
> about distortion.
>
> the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
>
> if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
> 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with the
> idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will have
> absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
>
> thanks
>
I suppose you are talking about "perspective distortion". Not an issue with
flat subjects.
Also, do not get caught up in the megapixel hype:
http://www.smugmug.com/help/print-quality (scroll down) >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 03, 2006
Posts: 114
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:29 pm
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
i thought i wouldn't need it until i started reading the responses. i
am from the old slr school, and "wide angles" means fisheye to me.
that's why i said i'd never use a wide angle. of course, i thought that
anything under 55mmfor a dslr was a wide angle but i guess i was wrong.
and i will certainly need one for my 30x40's.
J. Clarke wrote:
> bruin70.RemoveThis@mail.com wrote:
>
> > i'd like to get a digital slr to shoot my artwork. that is all the
> > camera will EVER be used for. i want a lens that will suit my needs. i
> > believe 50mm is slightly wide, is it not? so i need 55mm, and for
> > convenience anything up to 85mm, maybe. most important is the lens have
> > as little distortion as possible
> >
> > should i get ,,,
> > 1...50mm only
> > 2...85mm only
> > 3...55mm-200mm zoom
> > 4...24mm - 85mm zoom
> > 5...18mm - 55mm zoom
> >
> > these are the lenses available for the canon. the problem: 50mm might
> > be wide, yes? and because i have limited space to go back in my setup,
> > i am worried that an 85mm will give me problems on larger paintings.
> > and the zoom gives me my 55mm, but it is a zoom and i am concerned
> > about distortion.
> >
> > the nikon lenses have roughly the same.
> >
> > if i am worried about distortion, BUT settle on a zoom(because of the
> > 55mm) would a 55-200 be better than a 28-80. i'm not too cozy with the
> > idea of a wide to telephoto format like the 28-80. btw,,,i will have
> > absolutely ZERO need for a wide. i wish there were a 55-85.
>
> Your post is very confusing. You say that you have limited space and need
> to get close but you at the same time say that you have no need for a
> "wide", which is in fact _exactly_ what you need if you don't have much
> space.
>
> Why don't you try telling us what you are trying to shoot (including its
> dimensions) and how much space you have to work in and what kind of budget
> you have and what you intend to do with the resulting photos and maybe
> someone will be in a better position to help you.
> >
> > thanks
>
> --
> --John
> to email, dial "usenet" and validate
> (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 03, 2006
Posts: 114
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:36 pm
Post subject: Re: what's the best lens for my purposes??? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
is there such a thing as a zoom macro, and would that be a good option?
sounds like if i could get one that is about 24mm to 5x or a little
more, that would be ideal. i was shying away from sigma and tamron cuz
i always thought they were cheap compared to the nikon or canon lenses.
they never felt as solid.
tomm42 wrote:
> I have done art work photography professionally for 30 years.
> Even with 35mm the best lens for shooting artwork is a macro lens, more
> because the have a flat field rather than a curved field of normal
> lenses. You want a DSLR (Canon 30D or Nikon D200 would be you best
> bets) and a 50-60 mm macro. The 50 Sigma would be ideal, since it is a
> little shorter than the 55 or 60 macros Nikon and Canon have and you
> have a constrained space, these would also work with 35mm, no worry of
> distortion with a macro. With a quality camera (as I listed) auto focus
> should be no problem, getting a split image screen is a little bit of a
> hassle but they are available, saddly not from the camera
> manufacturers.
> Lighting is also an issue, polarized lighting is the best to use. Buy a
> couple of Lowel Totalights and work from there.
> If you want to do professional work you need a DSLR, small sensor
> digicams aren't going to hack it if you are submitting to magazines.
> Also a good macro lens is the only way to go when shooting, a long
> telephoto (150-200mm) also works but it doesn't sound like an option in
> your space.
>
> Tom >> Stay informed about: what's the best lens for my purposes??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | | Threading question: any camera lens thread compatible with.. - I'm not concerned with back focal length - I'm just looking for body caps for C or CS-Mount cameras! All the body caps I find are for Canon EOS, or Leica M, or .... Are any of these threads 1" x 32 TPI (the standard for C and CS-Mount lenses)? Th... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
