<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
jeecee wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:110220081828073236%25jeecee@home.ca" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In article <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:RY3pj.1558$R84.1369@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net"><RY3pj.1558$R84.1369@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net></a>, Paul
Furman <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:paul-@-edgehill.net"><paul- DeleteThis @-edgehill.net></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">JimKramer wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Feb 1, 11:39 am, measekite <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:inkysti...@oem.com"><inkysti... DeleteThis @oem.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">You only want to use Epson ink in an Epson printer.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Why?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">You're talking to a guy who's email is inkystinky Jim

He's been
making a stink about this issue in the printers group forever.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""> > I killed an Epson 880 and two 1280's while using MIS inks, because the
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">printers mechanically wore out, not because there was anything wrong
with the print head.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Aside from the ink battle, I would be happy with the Epson brand, I'll
look closely at the 3800 and 2400 specs (and thanks for the paper
tips).
</pre>
</blockquote>
The Epson 3800 seats 9 carts and has 8 ink channels and is cheaper when
switching the blacks. But the 2400 only seats 8 carts so you have to
physically switch the carts and it costs a lot of wasted ink to do it.<br>
<br>
If you co not want to spend $1500 then look at the two Canon printers.
Canon Pro9000 dye based or the more expensive Canon Pro9500 pigment
based. I hear that the Pro9500 produces a less vibrant print but
lasts longer. The Pro9000 produces a better glossy. One really needs
to see the results on a variety of prints and that is difficult unless
you know a few people that have these printers.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:110220081828073236%25jeecee@home.ca" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Since I want the same result and control that I had in the darkroom, I
think I'll find one or two people using the printers and see for myself
the results.
Thanks for the tips and advice
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>