"Charles Schuler" <charleschuler RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote in message
news:kqOdnUhqpalKgdzYnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Dennis Pogson" <dennis_nospampogson RemoveThis @ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:05_%g.50993$6C2.24673@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...
>> JohnR66 wrote:
>>> I've owned numerous compacts over the years by different makes and I
>>> find nearly all of them to be a little hot on exposure by 2/3 to a
>>> whole stop. This is usually apparent outside when some objects tend
>>> to be a little washed out. Gamma correction helps, but getting the
>>> shots with 2/3 or 1 stop under exposure seems to work best as
>>> highlight detail is retained. The sky becomes a deaper blue instead
>>> of very light cyan. I assume this overexposure looks better on store
>>> made prints as the contrast can be high (lost shadows)? For me
>>> underexposing looks much better and is like a free stop worth of anti
>>> shake.
>>>
>>> John
>>
>> All digital cameras vary from make to make. My Nikon D70 DSLR
>> underexposes
>> by about 1/2 stop, which used to make me think it was my individual
>> camera
>> until I read in 3 separate reviews that Nikon have deliberately made it
>> that
>> way.
>
> Some Canons err on the side of underexposure, also. This is better than
> overexposure as a little underexposure can be readily fixed.
>
In my experience, all these cameras exposed a bit hot:
Kodak DC280
Olympus D360L
Fujifilm 6800z, A330
Canon Digital Rebel (6mp), A610
These are cameras I own or owned. Looking on the sample shots on steves
digicams, most models seem hot to me.
John
>> Stay informed about: Do you find your camera to overexpose?