<b13171 RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1187719384.417425.218390@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>I must replace my HP printer.I primarily use the printer for home
> office work, printing crafts and photos. At the suggestion of some
> here, I am going to purchase eithr an Epson or Canon.
> I would prefer to get an "all in one". DPIs on these printers in my
> price range are 5670 x 1440.
> Canon makes a photo printer in this same price range with 9600 x 2400
> DPIs. How much difference in printing quality would this difference
> make. Or, are dpis similar to megapixels in cameras. (I have a
> Fuji with 5 megapixels-
> a friend with 7. I can't tell the difference even with photos blown
> up to 18 x 24")
> Thanks Liz
>
I use an Epson and print colour pictures at 1440 dpi. I have tried 760 dpi
and they don't look much different; but because I tend to print only 1 or 2
pictures at a sitting I use 1440. I did try 2880 but it took a huge amount
of time and there was no difference.
But in black and white there may be a difference between 1440 and 2880. I
use the black only setting so the grey bits are made of tiny black dots. I
assume 2880 dots are more tiny than 1440 dots. If I have a B&W that has a
large range of grey tones I use 2880 and I turn of the print command that
makes the printer bidirectional. Thsi means that an A3 takes a long time -
but the results are good. For those B&W that are gritty and grainy then
going to 760 dpi can help the image.
So I don't think that you need any more than 2880 dpi.
I print some A3 pictures at 130 pixels per inch instead of the 'industry
standard' of 300 ppi - and very good some of them look too.
John
>> Stay informed about: dip how much difference does this make?