toby.TakeThisOut@mkkbb.f9.co.uk wrote:
> Hi, is anyone able to help me compare these two frames?
>
> I have an IQ 9" digital photo frame (from Jessops, but it has a dead
> pixel so they are allowing me to return it and swap it for the new
> model, the Linx 8" digital photo frame.
>
> I cannot find any reviews for the IQ 8", and very limited number for
> the Linx, so is anyone able to help me out?
>
> The Linx seems to be a widescreen as opposed to the IQ's 4:3 ratio. Is
> this better for photographs? Also, should the Linx be able to play AVI
> videos if it says it supports MPEG1/2/4?
>
> Any help very much appreciated,
>
> Cheers,
>
> Toby.
>
I have a 'widescreen' Digital Picture Frame. My wife bought it for me
for Christmas. I would NOT have bought a widescreen as I know of no
cameras that produce pictures with 16:9 aspect ratio. There is a switch
to change to display 4:3, which is better, but the setting is not
retained (the ONLY one that isn't) after power cycle. sigh.
Go for the 4:3, or (if you can find one) 3:2. WHY doesn't someone just
design a frame that manages to display a normal 1200x800 picture at 6x4
aspect ratio? Don't these guys even LOOK at the picture sizes that are
'normal' for photography?
Now, to your issue. Why are you worried about a singly pixel problem?
Most of the time the viewer will be several feet from the picture frame,
and a single dead pixel will be quite unnoticeable.
>> Stay informed about: Can anyone compare IQ 8" to Linx 8" digital photo frame 
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
