 |
|
|
|
Next: Spyder 2 and Windows 7.
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Feb 08, 2011
Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 31) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:08 am
Post subject: Re: Toy Test [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2/8/2011 1:39 AM, ASCII wrote:
> Savageduck wrote:
>>
>> BTW; I wouldn't touch AT&T with a ten foot pole.
>
> FWIW: In defense of MaBell...
> I started with PBI (PacBell Internet) in the mid 90s then they became SBC whom
> I was with when I went DSL some years ago, now it's all part of AT&T.
> I use Opera v11.01 and was able to DL all the pics just fine.
> Since I run the browser in a sandbox and routinely delete any souvenirs
> of my browsing sessions I'm not afraid to enable javascript, cookies, etc.
Almost right. AT&T is part of SBC, Which changed its name.
--
Peter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Feb 08, 2011
Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 32) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:52 am
Post subject: Re: Toy Test [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2/8/2011 9:34 AM, George Kerby wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/8/11 7:58 AM, in article
> 4d514c08$0$5693$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com, "Peter N"
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/7/2011 9:09 AM, Savageduck wrote:
>>> On 2011-02-07 00:44:16 -0800, ASCII said:
>>>
>>>> Savageduck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Like I said, it's not a work of art, but I hope the overall
>>>>>> exposure and colour look good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.blind-apertures.ca/images/ToyTestSmall.jpg (fast
>>>>>> loading)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.blind-apertures.ca/images/ToyTest.jpg (full size jpg,
>>>>>> about 17 megs)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.blind-apertures.ca/images/ToyTest.png (full size png,
>>>>>> about 25 megs)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any comments appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Take Care,
>>>>>> Dudley
>>>>>
>>>>> Yup! None of those URL's lead anywhere.
>>>>
>>>> They all lead to the same pic of a dog's head,
>>>> with the [png] the slowest loading of all.
>>>
>>> I am still getting a "404" error.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Get a PC.
>
> I'd rather have bamboo shoots under my fingernails.
>
That can be arraigned. Do you want them with glowing tips?
--
Peter |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 08, 2011
Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 33) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:55 am
Post subject: Re: Toy Test [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2/8/2011 9:34 AM, George Kerby wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/8/11 8:05 AM, in article
> 4d514ddf$0$5681$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com, "Peter N"
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/7/2011 10:20 PM, Savageduck wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> BTW; I wouldn't touch AT&T with a ten foot pole. That is the reason I am
>>> using an Android phone not an iPhone.
>>
>>
>> Yup!
>> I had AT&T about 5 years ago. switched to Verizon and never looked back.
>> Those with IPhones have no desire for widespread reliable coverage.
>> Meanwhile, I am happy with my Android and ell not even consider a switch
>> to the Verizon Iphone until they come out with a newer model.
>>
>
> Sorry for your loss...
>
Glad it works for you. It didn't for me. There are some places where it
works just fine. But, when I travel I had a lot of issues. I also had
issues in NYC.
--
Peter >> Stay informed about: Toy Test |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 17, 2010
Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 34) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 10:26 am
Post subject: Re: Toy Test [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article ,
peter.new.TakeThisOut@nospam.verizon.net says...
>
> On 2/8/2011 1:39 AM, ASCII wrote:
> > Savageduck wrote:
> >>
> >> BTW; I wouldn't touch AT&T with a ten foot pole.
> >
> > FWIW: In defense of MaBell...
> > I started with PBI (PacBell Internet) in the mid 90s then they became SBC whom
> > I was with when I went DSL some years ago, now it's all part of AT&T.
> > I use Opera v11.01 and was able to DL all the pics just fine.
> > Since I run the browser in a sandbox and routinely delete any souvenirs
> > of my browsing sessions I'm not afraid to enable javascript, cookies, etc.
>
>
> Almost right. AT&T is part of SBC, Which changed its name.
And SBC was part of AT&T until the lawsuit. So it all just came back
together. >> Stay informed about: Toy Test |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 21, 2010
Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 35) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Toy Test [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 08, 2011
Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 36) Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:25 am
Post subject: Re: Toy Test [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2/8/2011 3:35 PM, ASCII wrote:
> Peter N wrote:
>> On 2/8/2011 1:39 AM, ASCII wrote:
>>> Savageduck wrote:
>>>>
>>>> BTW; I wouldn't touch AT&T with a ten foot pole.
>>>
>>> FWIW: In defense of MaBell...
>>> I started with PBI (PacBell Internet) in the mid 90s then they became SBC whom
>>> I was with when I went DSL some years ago, now it's all part of AT&T.
>>> I use Opera v11.01 and was able to DL all the pics just fine.
>>> Since I run the browser in a sandbox and routinely delete any souvenirs
>>> of my browsing sessions I'm not afraid to enable javascript, cookies, etc.
>>
>>
>> Almost right. AT&T is part of SBC, Which changed its name.
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
> The return addy on my monthly statements says;
> AT&T
> P.O. Box 5093
> Carol Stream, Il 60197-5093
> I'm not too up to date on which set of names or logos
> should be associated with any company anymore,
> just pay the bill and get back to surfing away my golden years.
If you think photography is an expensive hobby, try stock picking. (The
treasurer lets me have a small sandbox for that one.)
--
Peter >> Stay informed about: Toy Test |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | D-50 and Depth of Field preview? - Is anyone else using a D-50? The specs in the book mention a depth-of-field preview under the Lens Aperture catagory. Am I not finding a button somewhere on the camera body or are they just refering to the depth-of-field marks on the Nikkor lenses? I'...
Test - Test message. Sorry, I have to test if everything is working properly.
Test - This is a test, and only a test. If this were not a test, you would have been directed to...
Test - TEst
Just a test - that's all |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
