Welcome to DigiForumz.com!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   Digital Camera Community (Home) -> Pentax RSS
Next:  reducing MP's  
Author Message
RonB

External


Since: Dec 28, 2006
Posts: 14



(Msg. 16) Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)

Hey thanks. I have been lusting over the K10D but I really think the K100
is enough. I, like you, have old Pentax bodies and lenses that are driving
me toward a Pentax buy. Plus I have been very happy with the old KX and
K1000s that I still use. I also own a couple of the late 70's/early 80's
vintage Series I vivitars that are very good lenses (70-210 and f1.9 28mm)

RonB

"J. F. Cornwall" <JCornwall.TakeThisOut@cox.net> wrote in message
news:0KsYh.2499$ZD3.2358@newsfe01.lga...
> RonB wrote:
>
>> The Pentax K Series cameras are a little past their 1/2 year (K10) and 1
>> year (K100D, K110D) times-on-market. How about some hand-on owner's
>> impression of these cameras?
>>
>> - Oveall quality
>> - Operating ease
>> - Picture Quality
>> - Practical K-Mount utility
>> - Quirks (lotsa stuff about jpg processing, etc. What is real?)
>> - Happy, Mad?
>> - Etc.
>>
>> Thanks
>> RonB
>
> I got a K100D for Christmas. I love it, but I am still in the process of
> relearning a lot of photo basics I haven't used for a long time...
> The Pentax replaces a Canon A80 P&S which took decent pictures when used
> the right way, and both my wife and I had used Pentax 35mm models before
> the digitals came about. I have a K100, hers is an ME, with a nice 70-200
> zoom and a fixed 135 telephoto.
>
> Overall quality - I find only one thing that is noticeable, the fit of the
> battery compartment cover plate. Just a tiny bit loose and can be noticed
> when holding the camera in normal shooting position.
>
> Operating ease - Not bad, but I have no basis for comparison with other
> DSLRs. Menus weren't too bad to figure out. Manual could have been
> better, but that is true of just about any complex electronic item
> nowadays.
>
> Picture quality - camera is capable of exceeding my current skill level.
> Any faults in my pictures are *my* faults.
>
> K-Mount - this is the best thing about the camera for me. I have the
> ability to use the old 135 and 70-200 lenses just as on the old bodies.
> Both lenses are old enough that there is no auto-anything on 'em, but that
> just gives me the opportunity to relearn the basics of shooting 100
> percent manual settings... :-\
>
> No processing quirks I've noticed, but I just do basic cropping and
> touchups.
>
> HAPPY!
>
> Jim

 >> Stay informed about: Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions 
Back to top
Login to vote
m II

External


Since: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: 54



(Msg. 17) Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 3:55 am
Post subject: Re: Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

RonB wrote:

> Hey thanks. I have been lusting over the K10D but I really think the K100
> is enough. I, like you, have old Pentax bodies and lenses that are driving
> me toward a Pentax buy. Plus I have been very happy with the old KX and
> K1000s that I still use. I also own a couple of the late 70's/early 80's
> vintage Series I vivitars that are very good lenses (70-210 and f1.9 28mm)

I prefer the AA batteries used in the K100d. When I get some time I'd
like to run resolution tests on a bunch of old glass. I was thinking of
a large piece of graph paper for the background with assorted small
pictures and decals spread out over it.




mike

 >> Stay informed about: Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions 
Back to top
Login to vote
Steve B

External


Since: Apr 21, 2007
Posts: 35



(Msg. 18) Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 3:55 am
Post subject: Re: Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"RonB" <rbrogan.RemoveThis@cox.net> wrote in message
news:iptYh.201971$Pi4.118100@newsfe14.lga...
> Hey thanks. I have been lusting over the K10D but I really think the K100
> is enough. I, like you, have old Pentax bodies and lenses that are
> driving me toward a Pentax buy. Plus I have been very happy with the old
> KX and K1000s that I still use. I also own a couple of the late 70's/early
> 80's vintage Series I vivitars that are very good lenses (70-210 and f1.9
> 28mm)
>
> RonB


I've had my K100D for 7 months now and it can really do the business
quality-wise, even in jpg but you do have to learn its little foibles. The
very best quality will require RAW and Silkypix converter plus a good lens,
but good lenses include £35 ebay goodies like a 50mm A f1.7 I picked up and
there's a free Silkypix version that covers the bare essentials. Manual
focus is fairly easy with practice using a bright old lens because you get
a nice smooth long throw focus ring and the AF confirmation light still
flashes and is correct plus the viewfinder is decent. Prime lenses get
image stabilisation, so you're suddenly in a different league for low
natural light photos at lowish cost.

Jpgs are fine, but I prefer to keep the contrast and sharpening right down,
saturation 0, and give each picture some sharpening afterwards with a mix of
large radius contrast boost and small radius edge enhancement, it just looks
so much better that way but that's the same with most cameras that haven't
over processed (and usually ruined IMHO) the jpgs. If not post processing I
would use Saturation 0, Sharpening +1, Contrast -1 and exposure
compensation -0.3EV.

Problems?

Having to be aware that the Auto WB doesn't cover a wide range so it won't
de-yellow tungsten lighting, so manual WB or the fixed tungsten WB or RAW
are the order of the day for tungsten lighting. AWB works well in daylight,
bright or shaded but it's best to use the fixed WB settings. Cloudy and
Daylight cover most situations. People have complained about the WB not
automatically going to flash WB when the flash is raised, but colours seem
fine to me with flash if the camera is left in Cloudy WB which also works
very well indoors anyway with dull natural lighting, so that saves having to
fiddle with WB settings if taking a mix of flash and non flash shots.

The battery compartment is bound to wobble slightly if you look at it's
sprung loaded design, but it looks strong enough with metal hinges and
several catches, it's never caused any real problems for me, perhaps they
could have put a stronger spring in. The camera overall is very well made,
with a solid feel to it.

No focus assist light unless you buy a flash. The internal flash works when
raised as a focus assist light and works OK at short distances but is
annoying and only comes on when it wants to i.e. when it's dark, it can't be
forced on. Low light auto focusing is OK though but not quick and you
definitely need to aim at something with some contrast. With a bit of light
and a good lens it's fast enough though and always accurate bit it's a bit
noisy.

SR works well especially at distance, not perfect but a definite aid to not
losing shots. It's not so much help for macro but Pentax admit that, it's
obvious really when the system works by correcting for angular camera
movements and yet with macro the main 'shake' is caused by translational
movement (up/down/left/right) relative to the subject, not angular movement.

Conclusion?
It's a great camera if you take the time to learn it.
 >> Stay informed about: Pentax K Series - First Year Opinions 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Pentax K series SLR image quality? - Over on dpreview, the *ist DS was criticized for lack of image quality from out of the camera jpeg. Shooting raw was the way to go with this one. Seeing the side by side test with competing Canon and Nikon showed the lower resolution jpegs that were..

Pentax W10 vs. W20 - Hi, did anyone have a chance to compare the Pentax W10 to the new W20? They look pretty similar to me, the extra 1 megapixel is not worth much to me. I would appreciate any input on the new magic imaging features: Anti-Blur, etc... Are they any good?...

Pentax *ist DS - Hello, I am an amateur digital photographer, and actually do pretty well but need to learn much. What would be a great close-up lense for a Pentax Automatic Digital Camera. Any suggestions for me? Thanks John Loomis

Pentax K10D - hi, Ii have a nice collection of pentax screwmount lenses which I use with old manuel cameras. I would like to get a new digital camera and naturally think to get a Pentax. Does anybody know if my old lenses are compatible with K10 D? I have some lens....

want to use MOV files from Pentax W10 - I'd like to be able to join my cam's MOV files into a single AVI file that I can edit. There are lots of programs out there purporting to do that but not one so far that works. Anyone find one that works? Wondering if the W10's quicktime movies are..
   Digital Camera Community (Home) -> Pentax All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]