Welcome to DigiForumz.com!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Scanner advice (first film)

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   Digital Camera Community (Home) -> Scanning RSS
Next:  How has the Nikon 4800 fared ?  
Author Message
ASAAR

External


Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 3968



(Msg. 16) Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 6:15 am
Post subject: Re: Scanner advice (first film) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)

On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:53:32 -0700, Father Kodak wrote:

> I just got a roll of C-41 processed and i got the Photo CD as an
> experiment. Cost me all of $4 more. Smile
>
> Scan produces a 1536 x 1024 pixel image. Enough for a 4" x 6" at good
> quality, but I'm sure an 8"x10" would not make you happy.

Sounds like you got a Picture CD, which contains JPG files that
are 1536x1024 pixels (from 35mm) and 1536x864 pixels (from Advanced
Photo System film). Each Picture CD can hold images from only one
roll of film, partly because each CD also contains imaging software.

Photo CDs on the other hand can hold images from many rolls of
film, basically limited only by what fits on the CD. This is
usually over 100 images, or about 5 rolls of film. Each PhotoCD
contain PCD files which have five copies of each image at
resolutions ranging from 192x128 to 3072x2048 pixels. If you use
IrfanView to view PCD images, it defaults to showing the 768 x 512
pixel version.

To show either of the largest two image sizes (1536x1024 or
3072x2048) you have to download and install the PhotoCD plugin.
There's also a Pro Photo CD designed that's really designed for
images from MF roll film and 4x5 sheets which adds a sixth
resolution image of 6144x4096 pixels. IrfanView doesn't have an
option to display these 24mp images.

 >> Stay informed about: Scanner advice (first film) 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Bean

External


Since: Oct 02, 2005
Posts: 466



(Msg. 17) Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:46 am
Post subject: Re: Scanner advice (first film) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:55:14 -0700, Father Kodak
<dont_bother.TakeThisOut@IDontCare.COM> wrote:

>On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:38:31 +0100, John Bean <waterfoot.TakeThisOut@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Smarter software. Vuescan for instance seems to be
>>surprisingly effective in "ignoring" the problems associated
>>with Kodachrome yet still providing very effective dust
>>removal. It tends to slow down the scanning quite a lot, but
>>that's got to be better than spotting by hand.
>
>Does VueScan or other software have a setting for black and white film
>(or even multiple settings for different kinds of b&w?)

It does indeen. You can adjust anything by eye, but profiles
are built-in for a number of common (mainly Kodak) films.

I've been using Vuescan since 1999 and I've yet to find
anything better. Unlike most of the competition it doesn't
look pretty but it does the job.

--
Regards

John Bean

 >> Stay informed about: Scanner advice (first film) 
Back to top
Login to vote
Father Kodak

External


Since: Jan 12, 2006
Posts: 135



(Msg. 18) Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:46 am
Post subject: Re: Scanner advice (first film) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 09:46:55 +0100, John Bean <waterfoot.TakeThisOut@gmail.com>
wrote:


>>
>>Does VueScan or other software have a setting for black and white film
>>(or even multiple settings for different kinds of b&w?)
>
>It does indeen. You can adjust anything by eye, but profiles
>are built-in for a number of common (mainly Kodak) films.
>

Specifically for black and white films? Great!

>I've been using Vuescan since 1999 and I've yet to find
>anything better. Unlike most of the competition it doesn't
>look pretty but it does the job.

Which competitors have you looked at? Nikon? Minolta? SilverFast?
 >> Stay informed about: Scanner advice (first film) 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Bean

External


Since: Oct 02, 2005
Posts: 466



(Msg. 19) Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:00 am
Post subject: Re: Scanner advice (first film) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 09:46:55 +0100, John Bean
<waterfoot.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>It does indeen.

"Indeen"? Where did that come from?

"Indeed" is the word I though I'd typed...

--
Regards

John Bean
 >> Stay informed about: Scanner advice (first film) 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Bean

External


Since: Oct 02, 2005
Posts: 466



(Msg. 20) Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:07 am
Post subject: Re: Scanner advice (first film) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 02:33:00 -0700, Father Kodak
<dont_bother.RemoveThis@IDontCare.COM> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 09:46:55 +0100, John Bean <waterfoot.RemoveThis@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>>Does VueScan or other software have a setting for black and white film
>>>(or even multiple settings for different kinds of b&w?)
>>
>>It does indeen. You can adjust anything by eye, but profiles
>>are built-in for a number of common (mainly Kodak) films.
>>
>
>Specifically for black and white films? Great!

It even has profiles for some film/developer combinations.
Saves a lot of time sometimes even with an unsupported
combinations because you can often get close to what you
want, minimising the fine-tuning.

>>I've been using Vuescan since 1999 and I've yet to find
>>anything better. Unlike most of the competition it doesn't
>>look pretty but it does the job.
>
>Which competitors have you looked at? Nikon? Minolta? SilverFast?

I've used it with Nikon (LS-30), Minolta (Scan Dual III) and
now with an Epson 4990. In all cases Vuescan produces
significantly better scans than the software supplied with
the scanner, though the scanner OEM software is often
simpler to use for non-critical scanning tasks. I've also
tried Silverfast which produces nice results once I fought
my way through the odd user interface but since it's not as
flexible as Vuescan - and more expensive - I didn't pursue
it.

Vuescan's user interface puts some people off - it's *very*
plain and functional, no frills at all. I like that Smile

--
Regards

John Bean
 >> Stay informed about: Scanner advice (first film) 
Back to top
Login to vote
ASAAR

External


Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 3968



(Msg. 21) Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Scanner advice (first film) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 02:31:32 -0700, Father Kodak wrote:

> PS: Should I change my name to "Father Sony Image Sensor" or
> "Father Foveon?"

Use the latter and you'll paint yourself into a corner, Digi-Daddy.
 >> Stay informed about: Scanner advice (first film) 
Back to top
Login to vote
Father Kodak

External


Since: Jan 12, 2006
Posts: 135



(Msg. 22) Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Scanner advice (first film) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:46:06 -0400, ASAAR <caught.DeleteThis@22.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 02:31:32 -0700, Father Kodak wrote:
>
>> PS: Should I change my name to "Father Sony Image Sensor" or
>> "Father Foveon?"
>
> Use the latter and you'll paint yourself into a corner, Digi-Daddy.

.... Just asking, hypothetically, you know....

Father Kodak
 >> Stay informed about: Scanner advice (first film) 
Back to top
Login to vote
ASAAR

External


Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 3968



(Msg. 23) Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 1:31 am
Post subject: Re: Scanner advice (first film) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:13:36 -0700, Father Kodak wrote:

> > Use the latter and you'll paint yourself into a corner, Digi-Daddy.
>
> ... Just asking, hypothetically, you know....
>
> Father Kodak

s'OK. As long as you don't call me Asok (no relation).
 >> Stay informed about: Scanner advice (first film) 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Digital Camera Community (Home) -> Scanning All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]