Welcome to DigiForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Fuji S6500

 
   Digital Camera Community (Home) -> Fuji RSS
Related Topics:
Lag on a Fuji A201 - This was my first digital camera and is now about 4 years old and seems to have developed a serious lag. Can anyone that lag is something that happens to a camera over time with or is it something that I am doing wrong.

Fuji s9600 - Does anyone have any first hand of the Fuji s9600 digital camera. My current model is the Fuji s602 which has served me well. My usage is purely for family shooting with indoor and outdoor in equal I'm steering away from SLR..

Fuji S5600 - Just a quick few questions if anyone has one of these camera's. Is there a flsh sync socket or do you have to slave off the built in flash when wanting to use external studio style flash units. How is it with black and whire shots, can I lock it to ISO.

/fuji new camera ? - Hi I was is Fuji planning to deliver new 9000 series cam ? anyone know ?

Any user experiences for the Fuji F30? - Tried posting earlier but the post did not appear on the Anyone using this camera? If so opinions please? I need a low light camera. Is the F30 prone to the bad purple fringing of all the other Fujifilm cameras? Thanks
Next:  Telescopes  
Author Message
Greenbrightly

External


Since: Aug 03, 2007
Posts: 1



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 3:58 am
Post subject: Fuji S6500
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)

Hi,

I was wondering if anyone could share some opinions on this camera?
I'm considering buying one as I quite like the look and feel and also
the spec.

Thanks.

Neil

 >> Stay informed about: Fuji S6500 
Back to top
Login to vote
ASAAR

External


Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 3961



(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Fuji S6500 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:58:35 -0700, Greenbrightly wrote:

> I was wondering if anyone could share some opinions on this camera?
> I'm considering buying one as I quite like the look and feel and also
> the spec.

The S6000fd/S6500fb is a very nice, reasonably priced camera. I
haven't used one but I'm pretty sure that it's quite a bit better
than my similar, smaller, older, 4mp Fuji S5100/S5600 which has been
a very good performer. DPReview said :

> It's only when you look at these 'real world' crops that the real
> advantage of the Super CCD sensor used in the S6000fd is obvious.
> With all small CCD compacts we see serious smearing of low
> contrast detail at ISO 200 (sometimes even lower), but the S6000fd
> manages to keep plenty of texture at ISO 400, and even ISO 800 and
> 1600 haven't smeared it all away (in fact the noise reduction at 800
> and 1600 appears to be very similar; you just get more noise at 1600).
> ISO 3200 is, to put it politely, rather light on detail, and you're
> certainly not getting the claimed 'full resolution' ISO 3200 output.
> Still, it's better than anything else on the market...

> Although the S6000fd's output has a little of the classic 'Super CCD'
> artefacts look to it and is a touch over-sharpened, there's no denying
> that it is outperforming the Sony [the DSC-H2] - which is fairly
> representative of the other 6MP super zooms on the market - by a
> considerable margin. Edge-to-edge detail is excellent, colors bright
> but natural and contrast excellent. It's interesting to note that the
> S6000fd actually produces output that actually looks better at 100%
> (as here) than the S9000 we tested last year (which has the same lens).
> Comparing the results would seem to suggest that the lens itself is the
> limiting factor; it works brilliantly with this 6MP sensor, whereas the
> S9000's 9MP sensor is simply asking too much of it.

> More of the same really; the S6500fd's output is starting to show signs of
> breaking down, but compared to the H2 it looks clean, clear and detailed.
> Just like the F30, the S6500fd's output at ISO 800 is considerably better
> than most of its competitors manage at ISO 400 - and some at ISO 200.
> To have a small-sensor camera capable of producing results that are
> perfectly usable at ISO 800 is a luxury we have rarely seen before, and
> something for which Fuji must be congratulated.

> Comparison cameras:
>
> * Fujifilm FinePix S6000fd / S6500fd (6 MP, 10.7x zoom)
> * Sony DSC-H2 (6 MP, 12x zoom)
> * Canon PowerShot S3 IS (6 MP, 12x zoom)
> * Panasonic DMC-FZ7 (6 MP, 12 x zoom)
>
> Shots here are of our standard resolution chart (version one or two).
> This chart allows us to measure the actual performance of the lens
> and sensor system. It measures the ability of the camera to resolve
> lines at gradually higher resolutions and enables us to provide a
> definitive value for comparison purposes.

here, the S6500 clearly produced more detail than the other
cameras tested, and DPReview added :

> Although the JPEGs are a bit over-sharpened, and they don't quite
> match the F30, the S6500fd sets a new standard for resolution in a
> 6MP 'super zoom' camera, and out-performs cameras with one or
> even two million more pixels. There's little, if any moiré and only the
> merest hint of jagginess on 45 degree diagonals, and overall you can't
> fail to be impressed with a camera that really does squeeze the
> maximum detail out of 6 million pixels, across the frame.

and from the Conclusion page :
> * Excellent resolution & sharpness
> * Very good results up to ISO 400, ISO 800 perfectly usable
> * Class-leading high ISO performance; might not be fantastic,
> but it's the best you'll get
> * Very low shutter lag
> * Comprehensive photographic controls
> * Excellent battery life
> * Highly versatile 28-300mm zoom range
> * Low distortion lens with excellent edge-to-edge performance
> * Good flash performance
> * Decent movie mode, can zoom whilst filming
> * CCD-raw mode and decent raw conversion utility
> * Fairly fast focus (especially towards the wide end of the zoom range)
> * AF illuminator
> * Fast, effective face detection system (bit of a novelty for the serious user)
> * Large clear screen
> * Threaded lens for optional wide / tele convertors
> * Good value for money

> I must admit I didn't really know what to expect from the S6000fd
> (having used some of its predecessors), and I was pleasantly surprised
> to find it was a well designed, well executed and surprisingly versatile
> photographic tool. It's probably not the best 'point and shoot' model
> in its class (you'll get better results if you know what you're doing),
> but the combination of features, output and unusually able high ISO
> performance means that - whilst far from perfect - it can easily hold
> its own against some of it's more 'high profile' competitors.

The full review starts at :

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilms6000fd/

 >> Stay informed about: Fuji S6500 
Back to top
Login to vote
AAvK

External


Since: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 54



(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 9:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Fuji S6500 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Greenbrightly" <neil.woodman.TakeThisOut@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1186138715.563326.79760@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could share some opinions on this camera?
> I'm considering buying one as I quite like the look and feel and also
> the spec.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Neil
>

I did my research on the review sites and bought one, mine is the same as the
s6500 but it is the s6000fd US version. I am definitely happy I did! It is really
quite a camera for the money. At the time, there was a $50 rebate, took advantage
no problem.

It is a very solid performer, color, sharpness and detail are incredible, at least in
comparison to my first, the Nikon e950 of '99. It is not an action camera in raw
mode (6-9 seconds between shots), but it can be in high jpeg mode. It operates
super cleanly and solidly, they did a great job writing it's OS, which is easy to
follow (very), but it needs a few innovative features, which would be possible.

It can be very well used as an artistic camera and a family one, though it is the
size and weight of a small D-SLR (my hands are BIG!). The 28mm wide is very
nice but the 300mm is not really enough, and it's up coming replacement (s8000fd)
will have a longer lens (under 500mm) but a smaller CCD. It is always: the size
of the taking element, whether film or chip, decides not only the numbers of focal
length, but as well the size of the whole lens. With CCD sizes and film frame sizes...

the_larger_the_better.

But, price for quality is a high value with this camera. Just two months ago the count
of images on www.pbase.com by the s6000fd was just over 3,000 - now it is up over
5,000! You take a look there.

There are some things any thinking photog would want with this maching, but for the
money... it's quite good. Also consider the s9500.

--
}<)))*> Giant_Alex
cravdraa_at-yahoo_dot-com
not my site: http://www.e-sword.net/
 >> Stay informed about: Fuji S6500 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Digital Camera Community (Home) -> Fuji All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]