 |
|
 |
|
Next: Gimp vs Photoshop
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Aug 26, 2007 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Post subject: Resolution or ratio set first? Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
Good day,
I hope this question makes sense....
I have digital picture frame. The resolution is 900x500. After reading a lot
of comments by other people concerning this frame on www.buy.com it turns
out that the picture ratio is 16:9 (HDTV).
Here is my question: Should I set the resolution first or the ratio? Or does
it even make a difference? I do take some pictures in raw format and the
pictures can be 6meg or so.
I want to thank you ahead of time for helping,
Wes >> Stay informed about: Resolution or ratio set first? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 26, 2005 Posts: 419
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 3:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Resolution or ratio set first? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Wes" <BellevueNE DeleteThis @Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:%skAi.55695$rH6.13862@newsfe22.lga...
> Good day,
>
> I hope this question makes sense....
>
> I have digital picture frame. The resolution is 900x500. After reading a
> lot of comments by other people concerning this frame on www.buy.com it
> turns out that the picture ratio is 16:9 (HDTV).
>
> Here is my question: Should I set the resolution first or the ratio? Or
> does it even make a difference? I do take some pictures in raw format and
> the pictures can be 6meg or so.
>
> I want to thank you ahead of time for helping,
>
> Wes
You first enable the Rulers.
Then you enable "fit on screen"
Next you set the resolution.
Finally, you enable "Maintain Aspect Ratio", execute.
If the resulting image would be too small, you then set the desired
resolution, enable resize, and select the interpolation method.
If the resulting image is too large in one direction or the other, then you
must crop to fit the frame.
You will need to crop unless your camera takes the shot in 16:9 format.
Jim >> Stay informed about: Resolution or ratio set first? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 26, 2005 Posts: 419
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Resolution or ratio set first? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Wes" <BellevueNE.DeleteThis@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:MBmAi.160347$g86.141325@newsfe14.lga...
> Hello Jim,
>
> Are you familiar with the computer program "Thumbs Plus Pro". This program
> allows for resize (resolution or sizes). It will also allow for triming to
> ratio, the 16:9 ratio my digital frame uses.
>
> So you are saying:
>
> 1. Set the resolution to 900x500 first.
> 2. Then do the trim to fit?
>
> Thanks
No, Wes, I know nothing of Thumbs Plus Pro. I gave an answer which fits
Photoshop.
I also interpreted 900x500 to be the dimensions of the image in pixels.
That is, it is 900 pixels wide by 500 pixels tall.
That is a very small image by the way.
By resolution, I mean the pixels per inch for the printer.
Perhaps what you are doing is creating a thumbnail because at the usual
setting for a print of no more than 300 pixels per inch, the
printed output would be 3 inches wide by 1.67 inches tall (i. e. rather
tiny).
In any case, what you need to do is to resize the image such that you can
crop to a 16:9 format. You may or may not need to interpolate.
Jim
> "Jim" <j.n.DeleteThis@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:IklAi.4612$Oo.3295@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net...
>>
>> "Wes" <BellevueNE.DeleteThis@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
>> news:%skAi.55695$rH6.13862@newsfe22.lga...
>>> Good day,
>>>
>>> I hope this question makes sense....
>>>
>>> I have digital picture frame. The resolution is 900x500. After reading a
>>> lot of comments by other people concerning this frame on www.buy.com it
>>> turns out that the picture ratio is 16:9 (HDTV).
>>>
>>> Here is my question: Should I set the resolution first or the ratio? Or
>>> does it even make a difference? I do take some pictures in raw format
>>> and the pictures can be 6meg or so.
>>>
>>> I want to thank you ahead of time for helping,
>>>
>>> Wes
>> You first enable the Rulers.
>> Then you enable "fit on screen"
>> Next you set the resolution.
>> Finally, you enable "Maintain Aspect Ratio", execute.
>>
>> If the resulting image would be too small, you then set the desired
>> resolution, enable resize, and select the interpolation method.
>>
>> If the resulting image is too large in one direction or the other, then
>> you must crop to fit the frame.
>> You will need to crop unless your camera takes the shot in 16:9 format.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>
> >> Stay informed about: Resolution or ratio set first? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2006 Posts: 166
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Resolution or ratio set first? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I've found that having an extra-high resolution helps hide JPEG
artifacts. Purchase a big RAM card and let the picture frame do the
resampling.
There's no need to manually crop unless some images aren't coming out
right.
In article <%skAi.55695$rH6.13862@newsfe22.lga>,
"Wes" <BellevueNE DeleteThis @Yahoo.Com> wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I hope this question makes sense....
>
> I have digital picture frame. The resolution is 900x500. After reading a lot
> of comments by other people concerning this frame on www.buy.com it turns
> out that the picture ratio is 16:9 (HDTV).
>
> Here is my question: Should I set the resolution first or the ratio? Or does
> it even make a difference? I do take some pictures in raw format and the
> pictures can be 6meg or so.
>
> I want to thank you ahead of time for helping,
>
> Wes >> Stay informed about: Resolution or ratio set first? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
Don Stauffer in Minnesota
|
External

Since: Jun 02, 2007 Posts: 109
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:32 am
Post subject: Re: Resolution or ratio set first? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Aug 26, 11:40 pm, Kevin McMurtrie <mcmur... DeleteThis @dslextreme.com> wrote:
> I've found that having an extra-high resolution helps hide JPEG
> artifacts. Purchase a big RAM card and let the picture frame do the
> resampling.
>
> There's no need to manually crop unless some images aren't coming out
> right.
>
> In article <%skAi.55695$rH6.13...@newsfe22.lga>,
>
> "Wes" <Bellevu... DeleteThis @Yahoo.Com> wrote:
> > Good day,
>
> > I hope this question makes sense....
>
> > I have digital picture frame. The resolution is 900x500. After reading a lot
> > of comments by other people concerning this frame onwww.buy.comit turns
> > out that the picture ratio is 16:9 (HDTV).
>
> > Here is my question: Should I set the resolution first or the ratio? Or does
> > it even make a difference? I do take some pictures in raw format and the
> > pictures can be 6meg or so.
>
> > I want to thank you ahead of time for helping,
>
> > Wes
I'm not so sure about jpeg artifacts- higher resolution does prevent
SAMPLING artifacts (Shannon limits). However, I certainly agree with
the advise to let the frame do the resampling, resizing, and cropping
if it wll do so. >> Stay informed about: Resolution or ratio set first? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 04, 2005 Posts: 370
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:40 am
Post subject: Re: Resolution or ratio set first? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 05, 2007 Posts: 59
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Resolution or ratio set first? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Wes wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I hope this question makes sense....
>
> I have digital picture frame. The resolution is 900x500. After reading a lot
> of comments by other people concerning this frame on www.buy.com it turns
> out that the picture ratio is 16:9 (HDTV).
>
> Here is my question: Should I set the resolution first or the ratio? Or does
> it even make a difference? I do take some pictures in raw format and the
> pictures can be 6meg or so.
>
> I want to thank you ahead of time for helping,
>
> Wes
>
>
I usually crop the image to the ratio first. But sometimes
it is better to leave the ratio, and accept that the screen
won't be filled completely. >> Stay informed about: Resolution or ratio set first? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
Don Stauffer in Minnesota
|
External

Since: Jun 02, 2007 Posts: 109
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:39 am
Post subject: Re: Resolution or ratio set first? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Aug 27, 12:44 pm, Marvin <physc....RemoveThis@verizon.net> wrote:
> Wes wrote:
> > Good day,
>
> > I hope this question makes sense....
>
> > I have digital picture frame. The resolution is 900x500. After reading a lot
> > of comments by other people concerning this frame onwww.buy.comit turns
> > out that the picture ratio is 16:9 (HDTV).
>
> > Here is my question: Should I set the resolution first or the ratio? Or does
> > it even make a difference? I do take some pictures in raw format and the
> > pictures can be 6meg or so.
>
> > I want to thank you ahead of time for helping,
>
> > Wes
>
> I usually crop the image to the ratio first. But sometimes
> it is better to leave the ratio, and accept that the screen
> won't be filled completely.
I just realized this is exactly the same decision faced when trying to
print on a printing paper that does not fit the aspect ratio of the
camera. Do you print smaller and trim the paper, or do you crop your
image before printing and then use the whole paper. A LOT goes into
this decision and is different for every print you make.
Personally, I have no objection to trimming print. Regardless of the
aspect ratio of the camera, or of the paper, the image itself should
suggest the best aspect ratio for it. For instance, I do a lot of
ships on the Great Lakes, and sometimes trim profile views to quite an
extreme aspect ratio. But this is, of course, a difference between a
print and a digital frame. So you are back to the original decision
whether to crop in the frame or crop in software, which is the same
decision as those who want to use commercial frames for prints. >> Stay informed about: Resolution or ratio set first? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Looking for 2:3 ratio camera - hi I'm looking to buy a mid-range digital for my senior parents, I know they will want to do prints and won't want to mess with cropping before printing, so want one that offers 2:3 ratio. Are there any Canon's that do this? I see the new Panasonic..
Rotation & aspect ratio - Could someone please explain why, when I rotate a picture 90° degrees in a viewing/editing program, the picture is stretched so that long faces appear rounder? The actual change (as measured with a ruler on the monitor screen) is from 1:1.25 in norma...
Resolution - Hello, This may sound like a stupid question: If I only plan on viewing my photos on my computer desktop (1600x1200), does it do any good at all to take pictures at any resolution higher than 1600x1200? If not, my 7.1mp camera may as well be a 2.0mp.....
resolution - When I click 'Order Prints' in pacasa2, sending to walmart, I end up geting a resolution of 63x96, that is about 6k from an origional 6mp picture. Is there a way to adjust resolution?? And if i upload directly without picasa2, I get 320 x480, still..
Another Resolution Question - All, If I am going to upload my pictures to a place like ofoto or walmart.com and want 4x6 prints, what is the best resolution they can handle? In other words, at what point is it "as clear as it's going to get"? I assume they cannot squeeze... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|