 |
|
 |
|
Next: Nikon Coolpix 8700
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Sep 05, 2005 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:17 am
Post subject: Photo feeder scanner? Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
I'm looking for a device I've not seen yet, but I'm sure is available
somewhere (or somewhen soon!).
I want a compact USB 2.0/firewire optimized photo scanner with a
'feeder' for prints up to size 4x6". I want to put a stack of 60 into
the feeder, calibrate for a representative image, set scan to produce
jpgs of about 4 MB, then come back two hours later.
I'd pay up to $300 for such a device. Ok, maybe more.
Anyone know of one?
Thanks,
john
jfaughnan.TakeThisOut@spamcop.net
meta: jfaughnan, jgfaughnan, compact photo scanner, photo feeder, sheet
feeder, automation, home, archives, image processing >> Stay informed about: Photo feeder scanner? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 05, 2005 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 3:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo feeder scanner? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Thanks! Fujitsu has a good entry level document scanner on the market.
I try to avoid HP document scanners; I had a bad experience with an HP
sheet feeder years ago (turns out my scanner was a shredder too!) and
have been phobic ever since.
I'm not looking for a document scanner though, they are typically quite
poor at image scanning. In any case their sheet feeders will generally
choke on a print. Too thick.
The device I'm looking for is designed to scan prints, not documents,
and its sheet feeder is optimized for prints. Also, it needs to be very
compact, I don't have much room. >> Stay informed about: Photo feeder scanner? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 24, 2005 Posts: 441
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo feeder scanner? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 5 Sep 2005 15:59:11 -0700, jfaughnan DeleteThis @spamcop.net wrote:
>Thanks! Fujitsu has a good entry level document scanner on the market.
>I try to avoid HP document scanners; I had a bad experience with an HP
>sheet feeder years ago (turns out my scanner was a shredder too!) and
>have been phobic ever since.
>
>I'm not looking for a document scanner though, they are typically quite
>poor at image scanning. In any case their sheet feeders will generally
>choke on a print. Too thick.
>
>The device I'm looking for is designed to scan prints, not documents,
>and its sheet feeder is optimized for prints. Also, it needs to be very
>compact, I don't have much room.
Sorry, I can't help.
Maybe someone else..
--
Bill Funk
Replace "g" with "a"
funktionality.blogspot.com >> Stay informed about: Photo feeder scanner? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 08, 2005 Posts: 57
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 12:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo feeder scanner? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
For your price range, you're probably better off outsourcing.
jfaughnan.RemoveThis@spamcop.net wrote:
> I'm looking for a device I've not seen yet, but I'm sure is available
> somewhere (or somewhen soon!).
>
> I want a compact USB 2.0/firewire optimized photo scanner with a
> 'feeder' for prints up to size 4x6". I want to put a stack of 60 into
> the feeder, calibrate for a representative image, set scan to produce
> jpgs of about 4 MB, then come back two hours later.
>
> I'd pay up to $300 for such a device. Ok, maybe more. >> Stay informed about: Photo feeder scanner? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 07, 2005 Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo feeder scanner? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|