No, you need to check out the Canon, the have been moving towards archival
inks and papers. It has been slow and they don't have a rated life as long
as Epson, but since most people probably aren't going to care in 30 years
any ways. Add to that that all of these "tests" are faked or simulated if
you like I don't think print life estimates do anything more than getting
suckers to part with their money. Do these prints last longer than
non-archival prints? I bet they do 50, 100, 200 years I don't think so.
But hey that is my opinion.
R
>> Stay informed about: Photo Printer Recommendations?