John Navas wrote:
>
> On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:49:11 -0600, John Turco <jtur.RemoveThis@concentric.net>
> wrote in <47AE7437.3C4B8845.RemoveThis@concentric.net>:
>
> >John Navas wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:18:47 GMT, John Navas
> >> <spamfilter1.RemoveThis@navasgroup.com> wrote in
> >> <bhsjq3hv1b4bfqj405kfmlbjoeh2kuu7m7.RemoveThis@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >> >My own opinion is that there are many cases where a compact digital
> >> >camera (the P&S moniker doesn't really apply to advanced cameras like
> >> >the FZ5 and FZ8) is capable of producing final images as good or better
> >> >than a comparable dSLR, and I believe I have the images to back that up.
> >>
> >> I've put a couple of sample DMC-FZ8 images on-line at
> >> <http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=7814de75d2a434094012e8015643d9c8fe36b48781dde586>
> >> The full resolution is available for download.
> >>
> >> I think you'll find the quality to be quite good, even though I'm not
> >> trying for perfect images to make a point -- these are just ordinary
> >> JPEG photos I've taken when out and about, and for the seal picture,
> >> I accidentally had in camera Sharpening set to Normal.
>
> >Those are some sharp shots, agreed. Although, they're much too small, to
> >prove your contention that the Panasonic DMC-FZ8 is as good as a DSLR.
>
> They aren't small. Full resolution is available.
Hello, John:
Sorry, didn't see those.
Cordially,
John Turco <jtur.RemoveThis@concentric.net>
>> Stay informed about: Panasonic DMZ-FZ8 versus comparable dSLR