 |
|
|
|
Next: Kodak P-850
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Oct 08, 2005
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:07 am
Post subject: Are Kodak P850 better than Panasonic FZ5?
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Oct 08, 2005
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 5:46 am
Post subject: Re: Are Kodak P850 better than Panasonic FZ5? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
David J Taylor ha scritto:
> tiresia2.TakeThisOut@hotmail.it wrote:
> > dimension are the same,zoom 12 x also,but P850 have:
> >
> > Video 640x480
> > Excellent lcd 2,5 with 230.000 pixels
> > excellent evf with 230.000 pixels
> > manual focus(?)
> > raw
> > ecc.
> >
> > I think;if site tests aren't much negative,i buy her....
> > What do you think about....?
>
> Kodak cameras have a reputation for producing a poor JPEG image - perhaps
> too much compression? I would check image quality very carefully. Even
> Canon have not been able to produce a lens (on their S2) matching the
> quality of the Panasonic FZ5, so can Kodak?
>
> David
...agree David.
But for me ,a little bit more of noise or purple fringing (or a little
less resolution),isn't a problem.
Kodak also have 50 asa !!(pana 80,273 difference)
i hope in a test....
hi |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 421
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:00 am
Post subject: Re: Are Kodak P850 better than Panasonic FZ5? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
tiresia2.RemoveThis@hotmail.it wrote:
> dimension are the same,zoom 12 x also,but P850 have:
>
> Video 640x480
> Excellent lcd 2,5 with 230.000 pixels
> excellent evf with 230.000 pixels
> manual focus(?)
> raw
> ecc.
>
> I think;if site tests aren't much negative,i buy her....
> What do you think about....?
Kodak cameras have a reputation for producing a poor JPEG image - perhaps
too much compression? I would check image quality very carefully. Even
Canon have not been able to produce a lens (on their S2) matching the
quality of the Panasonic FZ5, so can Kodak?
David >> Stay informed about: Are Kodak P850 better than Panasonic FZ5? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 11, 2005
Posts: 421
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Are Kodak P850 better than Panasonic FZ5? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Daniel Silevitch wrote:
[]
> To be fair, the differences between the S2 and the FZ5 are pretty
> minor.
> Real, but minor.
Agreed, unless movie resolution is a critical factor for someone.
> I have no idea about the Kodak, though. A quick look
> through a couple of the usual review sites didn't turn up any reviews
> of
> the P850.
That's part of the problem - there are a lot of unanswered questions about
that camera. The lack of reviews concerns me slightly - why no reviews?
Some sites seems not to review cameras which might get less than a
"Recommended" rating....
David >> Stay informed about: Are Kodak P850 better than Panasonic FZ5? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 2800
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Are Kodak P850 better than Panasonic FZ5? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
David J Taylor wrote:
> Daniel Silevitch wrote:
> []
>> To be fair, the differences between the S2 and the FZ5 are pretty
>> minor.
>> Real, but minor.
>
> Agreed, unless movie resolution is a critical factor for someone.
>
>> I have no idea about the Kodak, though. A quick look
>> through a couple of the usual review sites didn't turn up any reviews
>> of
>> the P850.
>
> That's part of the problem - there are a lot of unanswered questions about
> that camera. The lack of reviews concerns me slightly - why no reviews?
> Some sites seems not to review cameras which might get less than a
> "Recommended" rating....
>
> David
>
>
Full specs are on the Kodak site. Since the camera was announced only
on Aug 2, it probably hasn't become available for testing yet.
If it lives up to the specs, it should be a real winner.
--
Ron Hunter rphunter.DeleteThis@charter.net >> Stay informed about: Are Kodak P850 better than Panasonic FZ5? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | Kodak P850 filter question - Hi I've got a P850. Looking at the manual it says you need an adaptor to use 55mm filters for which it list neutral density and polariser. The UV filter is there but does not seem to be grouped with the other two. the question is .... DO I need thi...
Price Gouging/Was: Re: Question about Kodak P850 - ray wrote: <edited, for brevity> > I've found that there can be a lot gained by capturing 'raw' files rather > than jpeg. And, I ordered a second battery from Kodak for $30. <edited> Hello, Ray: That's highway robbery! You can find...
Why to avoid Kodak cameras - Kodak quits BBB - Anyone considering buying a Kodak camera should reconsider their choice. There are better companies to deal with. Eastman Kodak (EK), the company famed for generations of priceless photos, has resigned from the national Council of Better Busines...
Kodak does not like me.... Please Help... -
Ron - Kodak guy - Just bought a C743 and got it home before noticing box says Windows 2000 SP4 & XP. NO 98SE etc. Is that correct? If so then I guess I have to decide if spending the money on XP to upgrade my daughter's pc (PIII-733Mz-256Ram) is worth it given my.. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
