Welcome to DigiForumz.com!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's?

 
Goto page 1, 2, 3
   Digital Camera Community (Home) -> General Discussions RSS
Next:  Lost Comments & IPTC Captions  
Author Message
JakeC

External


Since: Feb 11, 2007
Posts: 21



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's?
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)

Hi all,

I just bought a two sets of 4 Energizer 2500mAh batteries yesterday. One
set came with a charger. I used that charger to charge both of the sets.
It took nine hours to finish charging each set (as indicated by the
turning off of the LED light on the charger and the warmth of the
batteries). Then I used a small, handy battery tester to see how "full"
the batteries are. Sadly my tester says they're just above "replace". I
remembered I also tested one of the sets right off the package and I got
the same indication. It seems like the charging has no effect on the
batteries. I also put a pair of the batteries into a flash light. It
turned out that the light was dimmer than that came out with the pair of
the no-name alkaline batteries originally sitting in that flash light.

Is there something wrong with the charger? Shouldn't my tester have its
pointer moving all the way across the "good" area of the tester, just
like any new batteries will make it to and show that the batteries are
full? Do I need to re-charge the batteries?


Thanks in advance for your input.



JC

 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
ASAAR

External


Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 3972



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:30:09 GMT, JakeC wrote:

> I just bought a two sets of 4 Energizer 2500mAh batteries yesterday. One
> set came with a charger. I used that charger to charge both of the sets.
> It took nine hours to finish charging each set (as indicated by the
> turning off of the LED light on the charger and the warmth of the
> batteries). Then I used a small, handy battery tester to see how "full"
> the batteries are. Sadly my tester says they're just above "replace". I
> remembered I also tested one of the sets right off the package and I got
> the same indication. It seems like the charging has no effect on the
> batteries. I also put a pair of the batteries into a flash light. It
> turned out that the light was dimmer than that came out with the pair of
> the no-name alkaline batteries originally sitting in that flash light.
>
> Is there something wrong with the charger? Shouldn't my tester have its
> pointer moving all the way across the "good" area of the tester, just
> like any new batteries will make it to and show that the batteries are
> full? Do I need to re-charge the batteries?

There's probably nothing wrong with the batteries. Fresh alkaline
batteries start out at a voltage just above 1.5v and just charged
NiMH (and NiCD) batteries measure slightly above 1.2 volts. So
your tester and flashlight are both showing you the expected
results. But as both battery types are used, the voltages will
drop, and if you have two flashlights running simultaneously, one
powered by alkalines and the other by your NiMH cells, before too
long the alkaline powered flashlight will become much dimmer than
the one powered by the NiMH cells. When used in devices that use
very, very small amounts of energy, both battery types will last
about the same amount of time. Cameras, on the other hand require
moderate to large amounts of power, and for these battery hungry
devices, alkaline AA cells are completely outperformed by high
capacity NiMH cells, usually lasting twice as long in some recent
cameras, and the difference can be much greater in older cameras.

I have a battery tester app. that runs on my Palm PDA, and it's
configurable, allowing several different battery types to be
selected. Same goes for some electronic devices (usually radios)
that have a switch to allow you to set it to "alkaline" or
"rechargeable". This allows them to show a more accurate battery
status than your voltage tester, which apparently is designed only
for alkaline batteries. Some testers are cruder than others. For
example, I have a small, inexpensive tester that uses the same
resistive load for all battery sizes, AAA, AA, C and D. Because the
smaller batteries have higher internal resistances, fresh, smaller
batteries won't move the needle as high as fresh, larger batteries,
even though they should appear the same. Better testers have ways
to present different resistive loads to different size batteries,
making them a little bit more accurate. The bottom line is that
your battery tester can provide misleading results unless you know
more about how batteries really perform. If you're interested,
there are some pretty good charts on the battery data sheets that
can be downloaded from Energizer's website. They're PDF files.

 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Joseph Meehan

External


Since: Jan 09, 2007
Posts: 203



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

JakeC wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just bought a two sets of 4 Energizer 2500mAh batteries yesterday.
> One set came with a charger. I used that charger to charge both of
> the sets. It took nine hours to finish charging each set (as
> indicated by the turning off of the LED light on the charger and the
> warmth of the batteries). Then I used a small, handy battery tester
> to see how "full" the batteries are. Sadly my tester says they're
> just above "replace". I remembered I also tested one of the sets
> right off the package and I got the same indication. It seems like
> the charging has no effect on the batteries. I also put a pair of the
> batteries into a flash light. It turned out that the light was dimmer
> than that came out with the pair of the no-name alkaline batteries
> originally sitting in that flash light.
> Is there something wrong with the charger? Shouldn't my tester have
> its pointer moving all the way across the "good" area of the tester,
> just like any new batteries will make it to and show that the
> batteries are full? Do I need to re-charge the batteries?
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your input.
>
>
>
> JC

As you know from the other post, there is nothing wrong. However I have
a suggestion. The battery charger is a very important part of the life of
those batteries. You wrote: "turning off of the LED light on the charger "
In general those chargers with as single LED charge indicator is charging
all the cells the same way. Since cells are never exactly the same some
really need a little more and some a little less. Those chargers that
tailor their charge for each cell (generally have a light for each cell)
will usually give better results.

--
Joseph Meehan

Dia 's Muire duit
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
ray

External


Since: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: 845



(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:30:09 +0000, JakeC wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I just bought a two sets of 4 Energizer 2500mAh batteries yesterday. One
> set came with a charger. I used that charger to charge both of the sets.
> It took nine hours to finish charging each set (as indicated by the
> turning off of the LED light on the charger and the warmth of the
> batteries). Then I used a small, handy battery tester to see how "full"
> the batteries are. Sadly my tester says they're just above "replace". I
> remembered I also tested one of the sets right off the package and I got
> the same indication. It seems like the charging has no effect on the
> batteries. I also put a pair of the batteries into a flash light. It
> turned out that the light was dimmer than that came out with the pair of
> the no-name alkaline batteries originally sitting in that flash light.
>

I would imagine that is because fully charged alkaline batteries generate
1.5 volts whereas fully charged NiMH batteries generate 1.25 volts - it's
a different chemistry.

> Is there something wrong with the charger? Shouldn't my tester have its
> pointer moving all the way across the "good" area of the tester, just
> like any new batteries will make it to and show that the batteries are
> full? Do I need to re-charge the batteries?
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your input.
>
>
>
> JC
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Adam Helberg

External


Since: Aug 27, 2006
Posts: 18



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"JakeC" <JakeC.DeleteThis@hotmail55.com> wrote in message
news:59Kzh.943347$R63.145309@pd7urf1no...
> Hi all,
>
> I just bought a two sets of 4 Energizer 2500mAh batteries yesterday. One set came
> with a charger. I used that charger to charge both of the sets. It took nine hours
> to finish charging each set (as indicated by the turning off of the LED light on
> the charger and the warmth of the batteries). Then I used a small, handy battery
> tester to see how "full" the batteries are. Sadly my tester says they're just above
> "replace". I remembered I also tested one of the sets right off the package and I
> got the same indication. It seems like the charging has no effect on the batteries.
> I also put a pair of the batteries into a flash light. It turned out that the light
> was dimmer than that came out with the pair of the no-name alkaline batteries
> originally sitting in that flash light.
>
> Is there something wrong with the charger? Shouldn't my tester have its pointer
> moving all the way across the "good" area of the tester, just like any new
> batteries will make it to and show that the batteries are full? Do I need to
> re-charge the batteries?
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your input.
>
>
>
> JC

The "tester" is likely a voltmeter (perhaps with a light load) and was likely
calibrated for alkaline batteries, so naturally it will read low for NiMh since their
voltage is lower. The NiMh are probably fully charged and hold as much charge as the
alkaline.

Adam
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Cgiorgio

External


Since: Oct 31, 2006
Posts: 214



(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"JakeC" <JakeC DeleteThis @hotmail55.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:59Kzh.943347$R63.145309@pd7urf1no...
> Hi all,
>
> Is there something wrong with the charger? Shouldn't my tester have its
> pointer moving all the way across the "good" area of the tester, just like
> any new batteries will make it to and show that the batteries are full? Do
> I need to re-charge the batteries?
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your input.
>
>
>
> JC

Nope.
Alkaline cells have a nominal output voltage of 1.5 Volts, without a load a
new alkaline has nearly 1.6 Volts between its terminals. A NiMH cell has a
nominal voltage of 1.2 Volts, when fully charged they will have around 1.35
Volts with no load connected.

In high current applications (like in a digital camera) the output voltage
of Alkalines drops much faster than that of NiMH's, because they have higher
internal resistance (Ohm's law). Most cheap testers do not simulate a high
current load (that would also unnecessarily shorten the life of primary
cells).

It is a good idea to use your new rechargeable batteries until your camera
shows a low battery warning and to recharge them only then. Many NiMH cells
reach full capacity only after a few full charge / discharge cycles. After
that it is sufficient to do a full discharge / charge cycle about every 3 -
6 months.
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Just D

External


Since: Jan 07, 2007
Posts: 108



(Msg. 7) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Cgiorgio"
> It is a good idea to use your new rechargeable batteries until your camera
> shows a low battery warning and to recharge them only then. Many NiMH
> cells reach full capacity only after a few full charge / discharge cycles.
> After that it is sufficient to do a full discharge / charge cycle about
> every 3 - 6 months.

We discussed that here a month or two ago and found that the full discharge
will kill the battery forever. So that's a very good advice that you just
gave! Roll back to the history and try to find the previous thread before
you give such an advice one more time.

Just D.
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Just D

External


Since: Jan 07, 2007
Posts: 108



(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Cgiorgio"
> Many NiMH cells reach full capacity only after a few full charge /
> discharge cycles. After that it is sufficient to do a full discharge /
> charge cycle about every 3 - 6 months.
....
> If you want to learn a bit about different battery types, you could
> read the material at www.batteryuniversity.com

Let's follow this advice together. Actually I read it couple months ago when
found the link in this NG.

http://www.batteryuniversity.com/partone-16.htm
"Among battery chemistries, nickel-cadmium is least affected by repeated
full discharge cycles. Several thousand charge/discharge cycles are
possible. This is why nickel-cadmium performs well on power tools and
two-way radios that are in constant use. nickel-metal-hydride is less
durable in respect to repeated deep cycling."

My special thanks to Micron doc-writers killed many laptop batteries with
their cool manual when I followed their advice several years ago.

Just D.
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Pete D

External


Since: Sep 14, 2005
Posts: 733



(Msg. 9) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

You cannot use the same tester for alkaline and NiMh, alkaline have a
nominal voltage of 1.5 volts, NiMh have a nominal voltage of 1.2 volts.

"JakeC" <JakeC DeleteThis @hotmail55.com> wrote in message
news:59Kzh.943347$R63.145309@pd7urf1no...
> Hi all,
>
> I just bought a two sets of 4 Energizer 2500mAh batteries yesterday. One
> set came with a charger. I used that charger to charge both of the sets.
> It took nine hours to finish charging each set (as indicated by the
> turning off of the LED light on the charger and the warmth of the
> batteries). Then I used a small, handy battery tester to see how "full"
> the batteries are. Sadly my tester says they're just above "replace". I
> remembered I also tested one of the sets right off the package and I got
> the same indication. It seems like the charging has no effect on the
> batteries. I also put a pair of the batteries into a flash light. It
> turned out that the light was dimmer than that came out with the pair of
> the no-name alkaline batteries originally sitting in that flash light.
>
> Is there something wrong with the charger? Shouldn't my tester have its
> pointer moving all the way across the "good" area of the tester, just like
> any new batteries will make it to and show that the batteries are full? Do
> I need to re-charge the batteries?
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your input.
>
>
>
> JC
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Cgiorgio

External


Since: Oct 31, 2006
Posts: 214



(Msg. 10) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Just D" <no DeleteThis @spam.please> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:UsKzh.6048$_k.3421@newsfe07.phx...
> We discussed that here a month or two ago and found that the full
> discharge will kill the battery forever. So that's a very good advice that
> you just gave! Roll back to the history and try to find the previous
> thread before you give such an advice one more time.
>
> Just D.
>
Please learn to read before criticizing posts. Discharging until a battery
warning appears and deep discharging are completely different meanings.
Usually a battery warning will appear around 1.05 Volts cell voltage which
is far from zero Volts (around 1050 milliVolts to be precise). If you want
to learn a bit about different battery types, you could read the material at
www.batteryuniversity.com . While latest developments are not taken into
account in that information, the basic information there is still valid.
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Just D

External


Since: Jan 07, 2007
Posts: 108



(Msg. 11) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Cgiorgio"
> Please learn to read before criticizing posts. Discharging until a battery
> warning appears and deep discharging are completely different meanings.
> Usually a battery warning will appear around 1.05 Volts cell voltage which
> is far from zero Volts (around 1050 milliVolts to be precise). If you want
> to learn a bit about different battery types, you could read the material
> at www.batteryuniversity.com . While latest developments are not taken
> into account in that information, the basic information there is still
> valid.

Sorry if I probably wasn't correct or polite writing my previous message.
Just look what you wrote: "Many NiMH cells reach full capacity only after a
few full charge / discharge cycles. After that it is sufficient to do a full
discharge / charge cycle about every 3 - 6 months." It would definitely
mislead me if I just read about complete full discharge after 3-6 months and
I'd follow this advice for sure using whatever is available, standard
discharger inside the charger, the device where this battery works, etc. For
example very good advice I got from the Micron laptop manual. It recommended
to completely discharge the battery at least one time every half-a-year. To
do that COMPLETELY I need to open the BIOS settings and leave the laptop
working with this battery until it shuts down, actually dies. Very good
advice completely killed the battery much sooner that it could happen. I
assume that some of the smart rechargers are able to understand where is the
killing level of the battery but we need to be careful giving these advices,
not all batteries will survive after complete discharge.

Just D.
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
ASAAR

External


Since: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 3972



(Msg. 12) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:15:40 -0700, Just D wrote:

> I assume that some of the smart rechargers are able to understand where is
> the killing level of the battery but we need to be careful giving these advices,
> not all batteries will survive after complete discharge.

As far as I can tell, all of the battery chargers that have
discharge circuits only discharge until individual cells have
dropped to about 1.0 volts. At that point, unlike alkalines which
will still have nearly half of the energy of fresh alkalines
remaining, rechargeables will be about 100% depleted, so it's
unnecessary (and unwise) to discharge them any further. My Fuji is
apparently one of the few camera that has a menu item that allows
the camera to discharge NiMH batteries. Of course the manual says
that it shouldn't be used for alkaline batteries, but I'm sure that
at least a few naive Fuji owners must have tried that. <g>
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Just D

External


Since: Jan 07, 2007
Posts: 108



(Msg. 13) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"ASAAR"
> unnecessary (and unwise) to discharge them any further. My Fuji is
> apparently one of the few camera that has a menu item that allows
> the camera to discharge NiMH batteries. Of course the manual says
> that it shouldn't be used for alkaline batteries, but I'm sure that
> at least a few naive Fuji owners must have tried that. <g>

That's nice! And you're right, the rifle visible on the scene in the very
beginning of the action will definitely must shoot before the action is
ended. Smile That's the basic theatre rule.

Just D.
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
tnom

External


Since: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 135



(Msg. 14) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

There's more to a battery than voltage. Your tester is only
one dimensional as it can only display the batteries voltage.
NIMH batteries by nature have a slightly lower voltage than
alkaline's. If your tester could be three dimensional it would
be able to measure the positive attributes of a NIMH battery.
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
JakeC

External


Since: Feb 11, 2007
Posts: 21



(Msg. 15) Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Joseph Meehan wrote:

>
> As you know from the other post, there is nothing wrong. However I have
> a suggestion. The battery charger is a very important part of the life of
> those batteries. You wrote: "turning off of the LED light on the charger "
> In general those chargers with as single LED charge indicator is charging
> all the cells the same way. Since cells are never exactly the same some
> really need a little more and some a little less. Those chargers that
> tailor their charge for each cell (generally have a light for each cell)
> will usually give better results.


I take that to mean I'd better get a better charger then.

Thank you all for responding.

From what I read, it seems to me alkaline Vs Nimh is like Sprinter Vs
Marathoner. One is fast and powerful but doesn't last very long, and the
other is not as powerful but last much longer. Judging by my flashlight
test it seems to be so. How's that analogy?
 >> Stay informed about: Nimh battery not as full as alkaline's? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
NIMH (rechargeable) and Alkaline non rechargeable - Hi all, Coming to grips with battery terminology. Have read lots of tutorials, opinions, grazed google posts and haven't really found out if one can put charged NIMH batteries in the place of non rechargable Alkaline batteries. I realise that voltage..

Alkaline batteries - Have you ever installed a new set of batteries and find your device, camera, flashlight, CD player... whatever it may be stops working early? Next you test the batteries with a meter and find one has died early and the others are practically new. I'v...

Full frame rocks - This weekend I used a Canon 5D for the first time. I was helping a friend of mine shoot a wedding, and we were using a 5D and a 30D. I guess the 30D is also considered a semi-pro camera, but man, what a difference between the two. Even with the same..

Memory card full when it's not - I hope this isn't a dumb question. I just bought a Fujifilm Finepix S6000fd and a 1G Fuji XD memory card. I put the card in the camera and formatted it, but after taking 6 pictures, I get the message Memory Card Full. The manual only suggests deleting...

Can NiMH batteries "just die" from non-use? - Four months ago, I got a new camera with a proprietary lithium battery and have used that exclusively since. Today, my wife and I both had something to go to, so I took the new camera and my wife took the old one. Of course it didn't work when I ..
   Digital Camera Community (Home) -> General Discussions All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2, 3
Page 1 of 3

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]