Microfilm into wall size poster please??

Sir F. A. Rien wrote:

>
> NO copy, regardless of what it's done with is better than the original.
>
>

That's not true with old documents, because copies and use filtration
and even entirely different spectral bands. Consider some document
that was rolled up, burned to a crisp, and then buried for 2000 years.

Sort of hard to read! But, copying it with an infrared camera and it
becomes quite clear.

I've copied letters from my great grandparents that are 170 years old
and are completely unreadable. Using ordinary infrared B&W film they
are mostly readable with great effort. Looked at with a 1.8 micron
TV camera they are as clear as the day they were written.

Doug McDonald
 >> Stay informed about: Microfilm into wall size poster please?? 

On Oct 22, 5:11 pm, u... DeleteThis @domain.invalid wrote:
> Sir F. A. Rien wrote:
>
>
>
> > NO copy, regardless of what it's done with is better than the original.
>
> That's not true with old documents, because copies and use filtration
> and even entirely different spectral bands. Consider some document
> that was rolled up, burned to a crisp, and then buried for 2000 years.
>
> Sort of hard to read! But, copying it with an infrared camera and it
> becomes quite clear.
>
> I've copied letters from my great grandparents that are 170 years old
> and are completely unreadable. Using ordinary infrared B&W film they
> are mostly readable with great effort. Looked at with a 1.8 micron
> TV camera they are as clear as the day they were written.
>
> Doug McDonald

Microfilm into wall size poster please?
Hi guys, I need this done commercially in NYC. Any ideas please?
 >> Stay informed about: Microfilm into wall size poster please??