 |
|
 |
|
Next: Sports Photography Nikon D50
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 21, 2006 Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:27 pm
Post subject: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
I'm looking for suggestions for a camera body and three lenses: a zoom lens
for general work, a wide-angle lens for landscapes, and a long telephoto
(500-750mm equivalent) for distant landmarks and the occasional moose
browsing on the other side of the lake.
The two criteria are: 1) the camera+lenses must weigh as little as possible,
and 2) the total cost should not be more than $2500.
Thanks.
--
John >> Stay informed about: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 23, 2005 Posts: 1029
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| John Smith <rengaw03.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> writes:
> The two criteria are: 1) the camera+lenses must weigh as little as possible,
> and 2) the total cost should not be more than $2500.
Are you sure you want a DSLR? Maybe you want one or two compact
digicams and a monocular adapter or digiscoping rig.
|
>> Stay informed about: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 22, 2005 Posts: 75
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:07 am
Post subject: Re: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 06, 2006 Posts: 363
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:07 am
Post subject: Re: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
simon wrote:
> I can confirm that the Pentax *istDL is nice and compact / light.
> I can comfortably fit the Pentax body with Tamron 28-200mm lens into
> the pocket of a fleece jacket.
>
>
> "Paul Rubin" <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote in message
> news:7xd58lhssa.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com...
>> John Smith <rengaw03 DeleteThis @hotmail.com> writes:
>>> The two criteria are: 1) the camera+lenses must weigh as little as
>>> possible,
>>> and 2) the total cost should not be more than $2500.
>>
>> Are you sure you want a DSLR? Maybe you want one or two compact
>> digicams and a monocular adapter or digiscoping rig.
But why is your right shoulder so droopy? Is this a congenital deformity? >> Stay informed about: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 31, 2005 Posts: 279
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
John Smith wrote:
> I'm looking for suggestions for a camera body and three lenses: a zoom lens
> for general work, a wide-angle lens for landscapes, and a long telephoto
> (500-750mm equivalent) for distant landmarks and the occasional moose
> browsing on the other side of the lake.
>
> The two criteria are: 1) the camera+lenses must weigh as little as possible,
> and 2) the total cost should not be more than $2500.
Um, right. Well, the sticking point is the big zoom, of course.
Probably the closest you will get will be the Tamron 200-500mm ( ~300mm
- 750mm equivalent) f/5.6 zoom. It goes for about $850. It weighs 2.7
lbs. That leaves you with less than $1700 for body and two other
lenses. You could, for about that much, get a Nikon D50 and a Sigma
18-200mm (~27mm-300mm equivalent) zoom. The D50 goes for about $550 and
the Sigma for $380. The Sigma will do everything from wide-angle to
telephoto. That would be close to being the cheapest way to go.
Nikons tend to run an ounce or two more than the equivalent Canon in
this price range, but if you are willing to lug around a 3 lb. lens,
what is an ounce or two one way or the other?
But, since these are generic lenses, you can probably get a Canon 30D
or even a Nikon D80 and still be within your budget. >> Stay informed about: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 22, 2006 Posts: 53
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <MPG.1fa79ad856b0443598b19c RemoveThis @news.supernews.com>,
Alfred Molon <alfredDELETE_molon RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <ehffsd$s5t$1@news.freedom2surf.net>, simon says...
> > I can confirm that the Pentax *istDL is nice and compact / light.
> > I can comfortably fit the Pentax body with Tamron 28-200mm lens into the
> > pocket of a fleece jacket.
>
> But does it have a 500-750mm lens (which the OP is asking for)? To my
> knowledge there is no compact 500-750mm (even 35mm equivalent) DLSR lens
> currently on the market.
Save your money, you'll never have the lens ready to use unless you camp
for days in one spot waiting for animal you think will appear. Even then
it probably won't pay for itself.
--
Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.
www.gregblankphoto.com >> Stay informed about: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 03, 2005 Posts: 42
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:55 am
Post subject: Re: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <1161663751.715757.127320.DeleteThis@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
cjcampbell <christophercampbell.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
> John Smith wrote:
> > I'm looking for suggestions for a camera body and three lenses: a zoom lens
> > for general work, a wide-angle lens for landscapes, and a long telephoto
> > (500-750mm equivalent) for distant landmarks and the occasional moose
> > browsing on the other side of the lake.
> >
> > The two criteria are: 1) the camera+lenses must weigh as little as possible,
> > and 2) the total cost should not be more than $2500.
>
> Um, right. Well, the sticking point is the big zoom, of course.
> Probably the closest you will get will be the Tamron 200-500mm ( ~300mm
> - 750mm equivalent) f/5.6 zoom. It goes for about $850. It weighs 2.7
> lbs. That leaves you with less than $1700 for body and two other
> lenses. You could, for about that much, get a Nikon D50 and a Sigma
> 18-200mm (~27mm-300mm equivalent) zoom. The D50 goes for about $550 and
> the Sigma for $380. The Sigma will do everything from wide-angle to
> telephoto. That would be close to being the cheapest way to go.
>
> Nikons tend to run an ounce or two more than the equivalent Canon in
> this price range, but if you are willing to lug around a 3 lb. lens,
> what is an ounce or two one way or the other?
>
> But, since these are generic lenses, you can probably get a Canon 30D
> or even a Nikon D80 and still be within your budget.
With that long lens, save a hundred bucks or so for a good
monopod/walking stick combo. Something like a Leki SIERRA AS staff
with a Bogen or Manfroto quick release head that you can put on it when
you need it to be a monopod. >> Stay informed about: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 15, 2006 Posts: 48
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:37 am
Post subject: Re: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <ehffsd$s5t$1@news.freedom2surf.net>, simon says...
> I can confirm that the Pentax *istDL is nice and compact / light.
> I can comfortably fit the Pentax body with Tamron 28-200mm lens into the
> pocket of a fleece jacket.
But does it have a 500-750mm lens (which the OP is asking for)? To my
knowledge there is no compact 500-750mm (even 35mm equivalent) DLSR lens
currently on the market.
--
Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus 50X0, 7070, 8080, E300, E330, E400 and E500 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
Olympus E330 resource - http://myolympus.org/E330/ >> Stay informed about: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 15, 2006 Posts: 48
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:38 am
Post subject: Re: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <btSdneHXFYmpbqfYnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com>, John Smith
says...
> I'm looking for suggestions for a camera body and three lenses: a zoom lens
> for general work, a wide-angle lens for landscapes, and a long telephoto
> (500-750mm equivalent) for distant landmarks and the occasional moose
> browsing on the other side of the lake.
>
> The two criteria are: 1) the camera+lenses must weigh as little as possible,
> and 2) the total cost should not be more than $2500.
The new Olympus E400 is the smallest DSLR on the market, but the problem
is the long telephoto lens 500-750mm, which is not compact.
--
Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus 50X0, 7070, 8080, E300, E330, E400 and E500 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
Olympus E330 resource - http://myolympus.org/E330/ >> Stay informed about: Lightweight DSLR for backpacking |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | RE- DSLR's that take AA batteries - I myself try to buy electrical goods/gadgets that use either AA batteries, or can be charged from a USB port. I have two adaptors that allow USB charging from 12v auto (i.e. cigar lighter) in my car or the same USB lead from mains electricity. Less..
2-part case for DSLR? - Carrying cases for SLRs are/were often in two parts: the front part could be removed for shooting, and the back/lower part stayed on to protect the camera. I have a D70 and would like to have such a protective case for it. I've looked at the Nikon..
Film lenses on dslr - These conversions are giving me a headache:)) If I put a film camera 50mm lens on a dslr what is the effective focal length? 75mm or 35mm?
Going backwards, DSLR to Fixed Lens. - For quite a few years, I stayed with the Sony DSC-D770 and its pro twin, the DKC-FP3. I refused to upgrade because the cameras were not the limit on what I wanted to do. My skill was. Most of my earlier work in film was large or medium format, so I..
is a refurb dslr/advanced p&s as good as a new one? - like,,,i buy my computers refurbed because they get the same warrantee and with computers is only a matter of replacing bad parts with good. are dslr's and advanced point and shoot the same way? aside from cosmetics, are you comfortable with a refurbed.... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|