Slim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an 80-200 f2.8 Nikon Zoom left over from a late and totally
> unlamented F-100 that I used to own. It was the most unreliable and
> fragile 35mm that I've ever had!
> Anyway- it seems that when you use 35mm lenses on digital cameras
> there are 'correction factors' needed in order to ascertain the
> equivalent parameters... jeez.. I can't believe I wrote that....
>
Nice lens. I can't believe you wrote that, either.
> If I use my 80-200 f2. on a digital camera, what happens to the
> f-stop?? I know the focal length changes, but what about the f-stop??
>
No effect. Also, the focal length does not change. 80mm is 80mm. 200mm
is 200mm. What changes is the angle of view, since the sensor sees only
the center of the image circle. It is as if you took a 35mm picture
with the lens and then cropped an APS-C frame out of the center of it.
Nothing else changes.
Of course, this has distinct advantages in some respects, not least of
which is that vignetting is gone. Another is that since you are using
only the center part of the image, you are using the best part of the
image produced by your lens -- sharper, brighter, better color than the
edges. All lenses lose quality toward the edges; now you just cropped
off that part. It has some disadvantages, too, not least of which is
that if you really wanted the whole picture you can't have it.
So, for practical purposes, multiply your focal length by 1.5 to get
the focal length of a lens required to produce the same image on 35mm
film. Your 80mm lens will produce the same image as a 120mm lens would
on 35mm; the 200mm end will produce the same image as a 300mm lens on
35mm. But always remember that it is not really a 120-300mm zoom; you
are just doing the same thing as if you were using the 80-200mm lens on
35mm and taking an APS sized frame out of the center.
>> Stay informed about: Lens Question