 |
|
|
|
Next: fuji f31 fd - new model f50 fd - any good?
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Nov 29, 2007
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:01 pm
Post subject: Higher-end compact or SLR for me?
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
Hi all,
I've been using an Olympus C-740 UZ for several years, and it's
showing its age. It's been a great first camera, and I'm a big fan of
the 10X optical zoom, but I'm tiring of its low resolution, no sound
for movies, electronic viewfinder, and long shutter lag.
I'm researching my options for a new one. On the one hand, I'm
tempted to go for something small enough to keep in my pocket. On the
other hand, I want good zoom and manual controls (for nature and
wildlife photos) and have been really dazzled by the photos one of my
friends gets from his Canon 350D SLR. And I'd like to be able to buy
something for $500-600 with lens.
* Canon PowerShot G9 - High-end compact, 6X optical zoom, can do good
movies... but dpreview.com is not impressed by its picture quality at
high ISO (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong9/)
* Canon EOS 400D - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, seems to be the
de facto standard, but it's pretty expensive and apparently the lens
kit is not so great (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos400d/
page29.asp)
* Olympus E-410 - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, CHEAP compared
to Canon 400D, but not as good dynamic range (http://www.dpreview.com/
reviews/olympuse410/)
Anyone have any advice for how to decide one way or another? I'm sort
of leaning towards the Olympus E-410 right now since I could afford to
start out with a 14-42mm and 40-150mm lens kit. But possibly this is
overkill for me and I should be aiming for a compact? Is there
anything similar in size and features to the G9 that I should
consider? Thanks for any help.
Dan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 394
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dan Lenski wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've been using an Olympus C-740 UZ for several years, and it's
> showing its age. It's been a great first camera, and I'm a big fan of
> the 10X optical zoom, but I'm tiring of its low resolution, no sound
> for movies, electronic viewfinder, and long shutter lag.
>
> I'm researching my options for a new one. On the one hand, I'm
> tempted to go for something small enough to keep in my pocket. On the
> other hand, I want good zoom and manual controls (for nature and
> wildlife photos) and have been really dazzled by the photos one of my
> friends gets from his Canon 350D SLR. And I'd like to be able to buy
> something for $500-600 with lens.
>
> * Canon PowerShot G9 - High-end compact, 6X optical zoom, can do good
> movies... but dpreview.com is not impressed by its picture quality at
> high ISO (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong9/)
> * Canon EOS 400D - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, seems to be the
> de facto standard, but it's pretty expensive and apparently the lens
> kit is not so great (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos400d/
> page29.asp)
> * Olympus E-410 - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, CHEAP compared
> to Canon 400D, but not as good dynamic range (http://www.dpreview.com/
> reviews/olympuse410/)
>
> Anyone have any advice for how to decide one way or another? I'm sort
> of leaning towards the Olympus E-410 right now since I could afford to
> start out with a 14-42mm and 40-150mm lens kit. But possibly this is
> overkill for me and I should be aiming for a compact? Is there
> anything similar in size and features to the G9 that I should
> consider? Thanks for any help.
You really should do more then just look at review, it would be a very
good idea to try a number of the cameras you are looking at. For me
using a DSLR is not just about better images, it is also a lot more fun
to use, at least for me.
The Olympus might not be getting great marks for dynamic range but it
will still be far better then any compact camera.
Scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 14, 2005
Posts: 21
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:41 pm
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
regarding the G9, I would not be taking pictures with ISO setting above 400.
You'll be fine.
"Dan Lenski" <dlenski.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8eb74127-c92f-46ec-9fc6-77fec579bce6@w34g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> Hi all,
> I've been using an Olympus C-740 UZ for several years, and it's
> showing its age. It's been a great first camera, and I'm a big fan of
> the 10X optical zoom, but I'm tiring of its low resolution, no sound
> for movies, electronic viewfinder, and long shutter lag.
>
> I'm researching my options for a new one. On the one hand, I'm
> tempted to go for something small enough to keep in my pocket. On the
> other hand, I want good zoom and manual controls (for nature and
> wildlife photos) and have been really dazzled by the photos one of my
> friends gets from his Canon 350D SLR. And I'd like to be able to buy
> something for $500-600 with lens.
>
> * Canon PowerShot G9 - High-end compact, 6X optical zoom, can do good
> movies... but dpreview.com is not impressed by its picture quality at
> high ISO (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong9/)
> * Canon EOS 400D - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, seems to be the
> de facto standard, but it's pretty expensive and apparently the lens
> kit is not so great (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos400d/
> page29.asp)
> * Olympus E-410 - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, CHEAP compared
> to Canon 400D, but not as good dynamic range (http://www.dpreview.com/
> reviews/olympuse410/)
>
> Anyone have any advice for how to decide one way or another? I'm sort
> of leaning towards the Olympus E-410 right now since I could afford to
> start out with a 14-42mm and 40-150mm lens kit. But possibly this is
> overkill for me and I should be aiming for a compact? Is there
> anything similar in size and features to the G9 that I should
> consider? Thanks for any help.
>
> Dan >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: 820
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:01:12 -0800, Dan Lenski wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've been using an Olympus C-740 UZ for several years, and it's
> showing its age. It's been a great first camera, and I'm a big fan of
> the 10X optical zoom, but I'm tiring of its low resolution, no sound
> for movies, electronic viewfinder, and long shutter lag.
>
> I'm researching my options for a new one. On the one hand, I'm
> tempted to go for something small enough to keep in my pocket. On the
> other hand, I want good zoom and manual controls (for nature and
> wildlife photos) and have been really dazzled by the photos one of my
> friends gets from his Canon 350D SLR. And I'd like to be able to buy
> something for $500-600 with lens.
>
> * Canon PowerShot G9 - High-end compact, 6X optical zoom, can do good
> movies... but dpreview.com is not impressed by its picture quality at
> high ISO (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong9/)
> * Canon EOS 400D - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, seems to be the
> de facto standard, but it's pretty expensive and apparently the lens
> kit is not so great (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos400d/
> page29.asp)
> * Olympus E-410 - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, CHEAP compared
> to Canon 400D, but not as good dynamic range (http://www.dpreview.com/
> reviews/olympuse410/)
>
> Anyone have any advice for how to decide one way or another? I'm sort
> of leaning towards the Olympus E-410 right now since I could afford to
> start out with a 14-42mm and 40-150mm lens kit. But possibly this is
> overkill for me and I should be aiming for a compact? Is there
> anything similar in size and features to the G9 that I should
> consider? Thanks for any help.
>
> Dan
You seem to be outlining two different sets of requirements - sounds to me
like you'd really like two cameras. A P&S to pack around most of the time,
and a DSLR when you're 'more serious' about it. >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 30, 2007
Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 1:35 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:19:14 -1000, Scott W wrote:
> You really should do more then just look at review, it would be a very
> good idea to try a number of the cameras you are looking at. For me
> using a DSLR is not just about better images, it is also a lot more fun
> to use, at least for me.
>
> The Olympus might not be getting great marks for dynamic range but it
> will still be far better then any compact camera.
>
> Scott
Thanks Scott!
I do plan to go try them out soon. I have already used the Canon 350D and
enjoyed it a lot, had a great feel and easy to use for me. I definitely
want to try the Olympus E-410 in person, because I've heard it may be
slightly awkward for someone with large hands. So pretty much no
comparison between the dynamic range of a compact and an SLR? Very
tempting...
Thanks,
Dan >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 30, 2007
Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:03 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:24:33 -0700, ray wrote:
> You seem to be outlining two different sets of requirements - sounds to
> me like you'd really like two cameras. A P&S to pack around most of the
> time, and a DSLR when you're 'more serious' about it.
Yeah, I expect I will keep the Olympus C-740 UZ... and I have a little
credit-card-cam as well which is okay for casual snapshots. At this point
I'll say I'm going for DSLR at this point, since it seems I'll be
disappointed by anything less.
My good options are the Nikon D40, Canon EOS 350D or 400D, and Olympus
E410 or E510, I think.
The advice I keep getting is to focus on availability of good lenses.
Which makes the Canons come out way ahead, I gather. And apparently the
number of autofocus-capable lenses for the Nikon is fairly small. One
other thing is that I have heard the inexpensive kit lenses that come with
the Olympus (14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 & 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 Zuiko Digital Lenses)
are much better than the Canons. Which makes me lean towards the Olympus
more.
What do you think about the prospects of the 4/3 Olympus lens system?
Will I have better choice in a year or 5 if I get really serious?
Thanks,
Dan
Our Low Price: $529.00
Shipping Quote Tell a Friend
Everything we sell is BRAND NEW and FACTORY FRESH *
Everything we sell comes with a full US WARRANTY *
Low flat rate shipping
* = Unless otherwise specified
For Quicker Processing Place Your Order Online!!
Receive a Free Digital Flash , Full Size Tripod , Lens Cleaning Kit , LCD
Screen Cover & 512MB Pen Drive w/Your Order
Free MP4 Player w/Ear Phone, Digital Flash & Free Upgrade To Express
Shipping w/Any Package Purchase! >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 16, 2006
Posts: 655
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:03 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <94L3j.4764$C24.814@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net>, Daniel
Lenski <dlenski DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> The advice I keep getting is to focus on availability of good lenses.
> Which makes the Canons come out way ahead, I gather. And apparently the
> number of autofocus-capable lenses for the Nikon is fairly small.
where did you get that idea? there's plenty of autofocus lenses for
nikon and both nikon and canon have similar lineups. the d40 will
autofocus with a subset of all nikon autofocus lenses (but will work
with more manual focus lenses), and as of right now there are over 40
different lenses from which to choose for the d40. >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 17, 2007
Posts: 310
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:03 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <94L3j.4764$C24.814@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net>, Daniel
Lenski <dlenski DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> My good options are the Nikon D40, Canon EOS 350D or 400D, and Olympus
> E410 or E510, I think.
Go with the Nikon or the Canon. Jeez...why waste money on something
less? >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 30, 2007
Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 6:18 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:36:13 -0800, Mr. Strat wrote:
>
>> My good options are the Nikon D40, Canon EOS 350D or 400D, and Olympus
>> E410 or E510, I think.
>
> Go with the Nikon or the Canon. Jeez...why waste money on something
> less?
Something less? >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Don Stauffer in Minnesota
|
External
Since: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 91
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:37 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Nov 29, 8:24 pm, ray <r....TakeThisOut@zianet.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:01:12 -0800, Dan Lenski wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I've been using an Olympus C-740 UZ for several years, and it's
> > showing its age. It's been a great first camera, and I'm a big fan of
> > the 10X optical zoom, but I'm tiring of its low resolution, no sound
> > for movies, electronic viewfinder, and long shutter lag.
>
> > I'm researching my options for a new one. On the one hand, I'm
> > tempted to go for something small enough to keep in my pocket. On the
> > other hand, I want good zoom and manual controls (for nature and
> > wildlife photos) and have been really dazzled by the photos one of my
> > friends gets from his Canon 350D SLR. And I'd like to be able to buy
> > something for $500-600 with lens.
>
> > * Canon PowerShot G9 - High-end compact, 6X optical zoom, can do good
> > movies... but dpreview.com is not impressed by its picture quality at
> > high ISO (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong9/)
> > * Canon EOS 400D - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, seems to be the
> > de facto standard, but it's pretty expensive and apparently the lens
> > kit is not so great (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos400d/
> > page29.asp)
> > * Olympus E-410 - SLR, well-reviewed by dpreview.com, CHEAP compared
> > to Canon 400D, but not as good dynamic range (http://www.dpreview.com/
> > reviews/olympuse410/)
>
> > Anyone have any advice for how to decide one way or another? I'm sort
> > of leaning towards the Olympus E-410 right now since I could afford to
> > start out with a 14-42mm and 40-150mm lens kit. But possibly this is
> > overkill for me and I should be aiming for a compact? Is there
> > anything similar in size and features to the G9 that I should
> > consider? Thanks for any help.
>
> > Dan
>
> You seem to be outlining two different sets of requirements - sounds to me
> like you'd really like two cameras. A P&S to pack around most of the time,
> and a DSLR when you're 'more serious' about it.
I concur. A small compact camera is a compromise. In general you do
give up something in quality of image for going small. This was true
with film photography and still true today. The bigger the glass, the
more photons you collect. >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 27, 2007
Posts: 604
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:33 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 30, 2007
Posts: 209
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:33 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Daniel Lenski wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:24:33 -0700, ray wrote:
>> You seem to be outlining two different sets of requirements - sounds to
>> me like you'd really like two cameras. A P&S to pack around most of the
>> time, and a DSLR when you're 'more serious' about it.
>
> Yeah, I expect I will keep the Olympus C-740 UZ... and I have a little
> credit-card-cam as well which is okay for casual snapshots. At this point
> I'll say I'm going for DSLR at this point, since it seems I'll be
> disappointed by anything less.
>
> My good options are the Nikon D40, Canon EOS 350D or 400D, and Olympus
> E410 or E510, I think.
>
> The advice I keep getting is to focus on availability of good lenses.
> Which makes the Canons come out way ahead, I gather. And apparently the
> number of autofocus-capable lenses for the Nikon is fairly small.
This advice is correct. Canon has a much wider selection of good lenses
that what is available for the D40. Another advantage of Canon is that
their mid-range lenses are much better than what's available from Nikon,
though Nikon has better low end, and equivalent high end other than the
fluorite lenses which Nikon doesn't do. Before you think that you'll
never use a high end lens, remember that if the situation demands it you
can rent a high end lens fairly inexpensively for a few days, but it
actually has to exist. In that sense, Canon has an advantage because
they have lenses for which Nikon has no equivalent.
Avoid the flawed 4/3 Olympus at all costs.
If you go Nikon, consider the D80, which won't limit you as much in
terms of lenses.
Canon has a big advantage over Nikon because _every_ EOS lens made can
be used on the 350D or 400D, while Nikon is a mess of bodies of lenses
that can't be used together, or that can be used without full
functionality, or that can be used if they are modified electronically
and/or mechanically. >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 27, 2007
Posts: 604
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:39 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Daniel Lenski wrote:
[]
> The advice I keep getting is to focus on availability of good lenses.
> Which makes the Canons come out way ahead, I gather.
Eh? The Nikon lenses are much better at the lower-cost end of the range,
and they are somewhat equal at the higher-cost end.
[]
> What do you think about the prospects of the 4/3 Olympus lens system?
> Will I have better choice in a year or 5 if I get really serious?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
For me, the 4/3 system has been a disappointment, in that it has not
produced enough size and weight saving to offset the poorer performance of
the smaller sensor. The Nikon D40/D40x and kit lens are almost as light,
and more versatile with lens choice. I got the D40 with the 18-55 kit
lens and 55-200 VR lens (the image stabilisation is very helpful).
Beyond that, handle the cameras, and if possible, try and define what type
of photography or what aspect of photography matters to you.
Cheers,
David >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 377
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dan . wrote:
>
> I'm researching my options for a new one. On the one hand, I'm
> tempted to go for something small enough to keep in my pocket. On the
> other hand, I want good zoom and manual controls (for nature and
> wildlife photos) and have been really dazzled by the photos one of my
> friends gets from his Canon 350D SLR. And I'd like to be able to buy
> something for $500-600 with lens.
If you want zooms up in the 8x or more range,
I think you'll be best off (on finite budget)
with a good "bridge" camera.
Getting very long zooms with a large sensor
requires a lot of glass.
I did this at DPREVIEW.com
Release Status: Not discontinued (current or upcoming)
Sensor photo detectors: 8 million or more
Zoom tele (T): 320 mm or more
Aperture priority: Yes
Shutter priority: Yes
Uncompressed format: RAW
and got:
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18
Olympus SP-560 UZ
Nikon Coolpix 8800
Fujifilm FinePix S8000 fd
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30
Samsung Pro815
BugBear >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 17, 2007
Posts: 310
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:17 am
Post subject: Re: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <ZWN3j.66295$RX.61412@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net>, Daniel
Lenski <dlenski RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> > Go with the Nikon or the Canon. Jeez...why waste money on something
> > less?
>
> Something less?
Olympus...definitely something less than Nikon or Canon. >> Stay informed about: Higher-end compact or SLR for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | compact vs slr - Can you get a compact as good as a SLR
compact digital SLR camera in the market - I wonder if anyone still remember about the Olympus OM-1 and OM-2 when they were introduced in the market in the early and mid 1970s? It was a small and compact size that it fit easily in my hand. I must say that I have relatively small size hand, and..
Print size 7 MP compact vs 6 MP DSLR - I have a 7 MP Oly SP550UZ and the 8x10 prints I make from it and my previous camera the C-7070WZ look very sharp to me. I use a HP 3110 printer set to maximum resolution. I have read that 7 MP should be just about big enough to print at 8 x 10, but the.... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
