|
Related Topics:
| Fuji S602/ size of ac plug /Fuji newsgroups? - Anyone know the size of the plug that plugs into the camera for a/c? I need to make an adapter so I can use my battery pack. The ones I have are angled, and I don't know the size? 3.5 x 1.4 or something else. any good fuji There was one I..
Which Fuji should I buy the Fuji S6000fd/S6500fd or S9100/.. - I have been taking a very very close look at the Fuji as well as the Fuji and feel I will be buying one of them -- but can't make my mind up which one. The S9600 is dearer but has a tilt on the LCD which for my..
Lag on a Fuji A201 - This was my first digital camera and is now about 4 years old and seems to have developed a serious lag. Can anyone that lag is something that happens to a camera over time with or is it something that I am doing wrong.
Fuji s9600 - Does anyone have any first hand of the Fuji s9600 digital camera. My current model is the Fuji s602 which has served me well. My usage is purely for family shooting with indoor and outdoor in equal I'm steering away from SLR..
Fuji S5600 - Just a quick few questions if anyone has one of these camera's. Is there a flsh sync socket or do you have to slave off the built in flash when wanting to use external studio style flash units. How is it with black and whire shots, can I lock it to ISO.
|
|
|
Next: Pentax K10D Night and Dark Field Tests
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 73
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:17 am
Post subject: Re: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
On Apr 17, 1:07 am, Alfred Molon <alfred_molonCAN... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <1176758600.100980.213... DeleteThis @q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> rander3... DeleteThis @gmail.com says...
>
> > Olympus is producing bottom of the barrel P&S cameras now. When I
> > think of the E-10, E-20 or C-8080 and then this new Sanyo-built,
> > "Kodakian" junk, it's enough to make me retch. My only hope is that
> > income for the P&S garbage they are producing can be used to fund R&D
> > on DSLRs.
>
> The Olympus 8080 is a good camera, with a lens on the level of a good
> DSLR lens. Haven't used the E10 or E20, but heard positive feedback. Why
> do you say these cameras are bottom of the barrel?
> --
>
I didn't, I was contrasting those good camera with the stuff they are
now producing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: May 25, 2006
Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:59 pm
Post subject: Re: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 07, 2007
Posts: 90
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:31 pm
Post subject: Re: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <slrnf28qj9.c3u.aznomad.2 DeleteThis @ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net>,
aznomad.2 DeleteThis @PremoveOBthisOX.COM says...
> >The Olympus 8080 is a good camera, with a lens on the level of a good
> >DSLR lens. Haven't used the E10 or E20, but heard positive feedback. Why
> >do you say these cameras are bottom of the barrel?
>
> tiny sensors with lots of noise. They're nice and cheap but take lousy
> pictures.
Have you ever used one?
--
Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus 50X0, 7070, 8080, E300, E330, E400 and E500 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site >> Stay informed about: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 07, 2007
Posts: 188
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:27 pm
Post subject: Re: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Rich" <rander3127.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote in news:1176770730.436779.72380
@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
> And the only reason I'd suggest such an experiment is
> that the Fuji sensor is the very first small sensor to offer the noise
> performance of a larger one, if not the DR.
I don't think that is true at all. The Fuji sensors don't seem less noisy;
the cameras just seem to have more aesthetic NR than some of the other
brands.
--
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS.DeleteThis@no.komm>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< >> Stay informed about: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 88
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:50 pm
Post subject: Re: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:31:32 +0200, Alfred Molon <alfred_molonCANCEL RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <slrnf28qj9.c3u.aznomad.2 RemoveThis @ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net>,
>aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM says...
>> >The Olympus 8080 is a good camera, with a lens on the level of a good
>> >DSLR lens. Haven't used the E10 or E20, but heard positive feedback. Why
>> >do you say these cameras are bottom of the barrel?
>>
>> tiny sensors with lots of noise. They're nice and cheap but take lousy
>> pictures.
>Have you ever used one?
one what?
I own an olympus P&S and the fact that you snipped all mention of olympus
P&S cameras out of the what I quoted in order to take my reply out of context
hasn't been lost on me.
My kodak 1.5mp took better pictures than my olympus 7mp stylus 710. The
latter is fine for outdoor pictures, but forget about taking indoor pictures
unless you like really noisy pictures. >> Stay informed about: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 07, 2007
Posts: 90
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:43 am
Post subject: Re: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <slrnf2anac.c3u.aznomad.2.DeleteThis@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net>,
aznomad.2.DeleteThis@PremoveOBthisOX.COM says...
> >> >The Olympus 8080 is a good camera, with a lens on the level of a good
> >> >DSLR lens. Haven't used the E10 or E20, but heard positive feedback. Why
> >> >do you say these cameras are bottom of the barrel?
> >>
> >> tiny sensors with lots of noise. They're nice and cheap but take lousy
> >> pictures.
>
> >Have you ever used one?
> one what?
>
> I own an olympus P&S and the fact that you snipped all mention of olympus
> P&S cameras out of the what I quoted in order to take my reply out of context
> hasn't been lost on me.
>
> My kodak 1.5mp took better pictures than my olympus 7mp stylus 710. The
> latter is fine for outdoor pictures, but forget about taking indoor pictures
> unless you like really noisy pictures.
So you have never used an 8080, E10 or E20, but still claim they have
lots of noise. The stylus 710 is a different camera.
--
Alfred Molon
------------------------------
Olympus 50X0, 7070, 8080, E300, E330, E400 and E500 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site >> Stay informed about: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 88
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:03 pm
Post subject: Re: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:43:43 +0200, Alfred Molon <alfred_molonCANCEL DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <slrnf2anac.c3u.aznomad.2 DeleteThis @ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net>,
>aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM says...
>> >> >The Olympus 8080 is a good camera, with a lens on the level of a good
>> >> >DSLR lens. Haven't used the E10 or E20, but heard positive feedback. Why
>> >> >do you say these cameras are bottom of the barrel?
>> >>
>> >> tiny sensors with lots of noise. They're nice and cheap but take lousy
>> >> pictures.
>>
>> >Have you ever used one?
>> one what?
>>
>> I own an olympus P&S and the fact that you snipped all mention of olympus
>> P&S cameras out of the what I quoted in order to take my reply out of context
>> hasn't been lost on me.
>>
>> My kodak 1.5mp took better pictures than my olympus 7mp stylus 710. The
>> latter is fine for outdoor pictures, but forget about taking indoor pictures
>> unless you like really noisy pictures.
>So you have never used an 8080, E10 or E20, but still claim they have
>lots of noise. The stylus 710 is a different camera.
Yes, but the thread before it was edited to take my reply out of context
mentioned olympus' cheap P&S cameras. It was to that I was replying. >> Stay informed about: What if Fuji doubled the sensor size? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
