 |
|
 |
|
Next: Photo hosting sites.
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Dec 13, 2007 Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:07 am
Post subject: Question: Comparison of Compacts Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital, others (more info?)
|
|
|
12 months ago I asked here what the best compact was . I was
recommended the Panasonic TZ3.
Now that the Fujifilm F50/F50FD is out , I am ready to purchase and
would like to ask the people here about a comparison ?
Any help appreciated .
Peter >> Stay informed about: Question: Comparison of Compacts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 27, 2007 Posts: 604
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:07 am
Post subject: Re: Question: Comparison of Compacts [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 23, 2005 Posts: 152
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:46 am
Post subject: Re: Question: Comparison of Compacts [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital, others (more info?)
|
|
|
"veritas" <coming_soon RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1nr1m310ctjuqqlk7d5fd5tle6q03ubrau@4ax.com...
> 12 months ago I asked here what the best compact was . I was
> recommended the Panasonic TZ3.
>
> Now that the Fujifilm F50/F50FD is out , I am ready to purchase and
> would like to ask the people here about a comparison ?
DP Review's site can provide a comparison, but they're different beasts.
Fuji is a little better at higher ISOs, but the Panasonic's much wider zoom
range make it a more useful camera for some. There are reviews of each here:
www.dpreview.com
take a look at the sample photos and you can probably choose the one that's
right for you. >> Stay informed about: Question: Comparison of Compacts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 27, 2007 Posts: 604
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Question: Comparison of Compacts [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
Kinon O'Cann wrote:
[]
> DP Review's site can provide a comparison, but they're different
> beasts. Fuji is a little better at higher ISOs, but the Panasonic's
> much wider zoom range make it a more useful camera for some. There
> are reviews of each here:
> www.dpreview.com
>
> take a look at the sample photos and you can probably choose the one
> that's right for you.
I would suggest that holding the cameras, testing how well the controls
work for you, is an important factor as well.
Cheers,
David >> Stay informed about: Question: Comparison of Compacts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 13, 2007 Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Question: Comparison of Compacts [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:56:26 GMT, "David J Taylor"
<david-taylor RemoveThis @blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this-bit.co.uk> wrote:
>veritas wrote:
>> 12 months ago I asked here what the best compact was . I was
>> recommended the Panasonic TZ3.
>>
>> Now that the Fujifilm F50/F50FD is out , I am ready to purchase and
>> would like to ask the people here about a comparison ?
>>
>> Any help appreciated .
>>
>> Peter
>
>See:
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cam...s=fuji_
>
>To me, the 28mm wide-angle and 10X image-stabilised zoom of the Panasonic
>would make for a much more useful camera than the Fuji, at the expense of
>being a slightly bigger and heavier unit. I have the TZ3 and find it to
>be an excellent camera.
>
>Cheers,
>David
>
Looking at the pair of comparative stats , I can see the TZ3 is not a
good camera for indoors e.g. a candlelit church .
The Fujifilm looks like it is better with sharper more defined
pictures.
Any other differences or opinions ?
Peter >> Stay informed about: Question: Comparison of Compacts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 27, 2007 Posts: 604
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Question: Comparison of Compacts [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
veritas wrote:
[]
> Looking at the pair of comparative stats , I can see the TZ3 is not a
> good camera for indoors e.g. a candlelit church .
>
> The Fujifilm looks like it is better with sharper more defined
> pictures.
>
> Any other differences or opinions ?
>
> Peter
The TZ3, like most small-sensor cameras, produces its best results at ISO
100. You need to understand the limitations of any camera and use them
accordingly. For candle-lit churches, you simply mount the camera on a
tripod or other bracing device, and use a longer exposure.
Cheers,
David >> Stay informed about: Question: Comparison of Compacts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 377
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Question: Comparison of Compacts [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
veritas wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:56:26 GMT, "David J Taylor"
> <david-taylor.RemoveThis@blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this-bit.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> veritas wrote:
>>> 12 months ago I asked here what the best compact was . I was
>>> recommended the Panasonic TZ3.
>>>
>>> Now that the Fujifilm F50/F50FD is out , I am ready to purchase and
>>> would like to ask the people here about a comparison ?
>>>
>>> Any help appreciated .
>>>
>>> Peter
>> See:
>>
>> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cam...s=fuji_
>>
>> To me, the 28mm wide-angle and 10X image-stabilised zoom of the Panasonic
>> would make for a much more useful camera than the Fuji, at the expense of
>> being a slightly bigger and heavier unit. I have the TZ3 and find it to
>> be an excellent camera.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>>
>
> Looking at the pair of comparative stats , I can see the TZ3 is not a
> good camera for indoors e.g. a candlelit church .
And the Fuji doesn't have a wide enough lens
to get much of a church "in frame".
Choices, choices...
BugBear >> Stay informed about: Question: Comparison of Compacts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 06, 2007 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:49 am
Post subject: Re: Question: Comparison of Compacts [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital, others (more info?)
|
|
|
veritas <coming_soon RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
: 12 months ago I asked here what the best compact was . I was
: recommended the Panasonic TZ3.
:
: Now that the Fujifilm F50/F50FD is out , I am ready to purchase and
: would like to ask the people here about a comparison ?
The best for all practical purposes IMHO is Panasonic FZ18. Compact and
light-weight---but won't fit into pockets. Zoom 28-504 (18x). Best
price $299.
If you need pocketability and respectable zoom can live without manual
controls, then the best is Panasonic TZ3. Zoom 28-280 (10x). Best price
239.
If you need pocketability and manual controls, but can live wothout a
long tele zoom, then the best is Panasonic LX2. Zoom 28-112 (4x). Best
price 319. The same camera sells under Leica name for around $600!
The best prices I mention are from only a couple days ago when we
researched this for a family member. >> Stay informed about: Question: Comparison of Compacts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | 10MP compacts. I am not impressed - While not all 10MP cameras were reviewed, I have to say, so far, I am not impressed with what I'm seeing. For one thing, Noise reducing algorithms are taking their toll at even at lowest ISO settings. There are two main problem areas I'm concerned..
Lens Hoods on compacts? - I note that pro's using SLR's (film OR digital), and pro's doing video always use socking great lens hoods. If I want to maximise the quality of the shots I take with my digital compact (I now have a Canon a630) should I follow suit? Or are the small..
Digital/Analogue Comparisons - I was hunting around to see if there are any credible articles reviewing the state of play of analogue vs. digital photography for various levels of equipment. I didn't find anything and wondered if anyone knows of such articles. I was hoping to see....
International price comparison - Posters from other countries, fill in the blanks: Canon A710IS Best price avail. Local Currency converted into USA$ USA $275 = US $275 AUSTRALIA $424 = US $350 MALAYSAIA RGT1100 = US $315 HONG KONG HKD1759 = US...
Comparison of digiscoping hardware - The most important features of digital telephoto photography hardware are the minimum field of view (the smaller the better) and the resolution (the bigger the better). The field of view (sometimes call angle) conveys info about the magnification of the.... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|