|
Related Topics:
| Canon 24-105 f/4 L lens - Anybody ever try to put a on this lens? -- --- Paul J. Gans
which lens to get for Canon 400D? - I've recently acquired a new Canon 400D SLR camera, I'd like to see what y'all recommend in terms of a lens that matches the following criteria: - falls within my budget (less than 800 euro) - is small enough to tote around with minimal hassle (i.e. not
50mm f 1.2 L USM lens Canon - Has anyone tried this lens? Would it be worth the vs 50mm 1.4 Would it be worth the vs 85mm 1.2 what would be the big from 1.4f to 1.2f?
Best second lens for Canon 400D - Right, I've bought my 400D, I have the Canon battery grip with portrait shutter release etc, I have a Manfrotto 190 pro tripod and 222 joystick mount. Now I need a lens with a longer focal length, and hopefully a bit sharper than the rather soft one..
Lens for Canon 400D - I am planning to purchase a Canon 4OOD SLR. I have two old but in good condition Canon lenses that I used with a Canon 35 mm SLR. They are 50 mm 1:1.8 and 100 x 300 Please recommend what other lens I need to cover the basic range for people and..
|
|
|
Next: Hasselblad (and Canon 1Ds MIII) killer?
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 353
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:32 am
Post subject: To keep a Canon lens or not Imported from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 22, 2008 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:38 pm
Post subject: Re: To keep a Canon lens or not [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Shawn Hirn" <srhi.RemoveThis@comcast.net> wrote:
> snip <
> I own a very nice Canon lens. It is a Canon f2.8 24-70mm UL lens, for
> which I paid something like $1,100 a year ago. That lens is great, but
> it weighs a ton.
>
> The Canon XSi has an f3.518-35mm kit lens with image stabilization. I am
> wondering if I would be better served by selling my 24-70mm Canon lens
> and getting the kit lens with the XSi, or perhaps keep both lenses. The
> strength of my 24-70mm lens is it has great optics, and its fast. I
> also own a Canon f5.4 70-300mm lens, which I intend to keep.
>
> I like my 24-70mm lens, but it weighs too much to carry it around all
> day, and it is very bulky, but I am not sure if that kit lens would be
> as good, in terms of its optical quality, or do yo think most people
> won't notice the difference anyway? With the IS capability of the XSI's
> kit lens, it seems to me, that the major benefit of the f2.8 aperture of
> my 24-70mm lens is no longer a big advantage, or am I wrong about that?
>
> I like to shoot photos of night scenes, so low light photography is
> important to me. I am an amateur photographer with a limited budget, so
> I am thinking I might be better off selling the 24-70mm lens to offset
> the cost of buying the XSi.
>
> What do you think I should do?
I would keep the good lens. It will help you build the biceps! :O)
Seriously, I work under tight budget constraints also. If you already have
the lens, and it's good glass, and it serves you well, there's no point in
getting rid of it. You'll miss it when it's gone.
An 18-35 isn't going to cover the same range as a 24-70. For a while I was
missing the 55-100mm range when I bought my 20D. I found out I take a lot
of photos in that range. I finally bought a Tamron 18-200 to fill in the
gap. I have a 70-300 also, but it actaully starts at about 112mm.
If you want the IS kit lens, then get the kit, but I don't think I would get
rid of the good glass. I would love to get better glass than the Sigma
70-300 gives me, but it won't happen right now.
If you already have the good glass keep it, because odds of scraping the
money together later, may not be so high.
And don't let your wife tease you about carrying the "manpurse" around
everywhere. :O)
Have fun,
Dave >> Stay informed about: To keep a Canon lens or not |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 27, 2006 Posts: 444
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:15 am
Post subject: Re: To keep a Canon lens or not [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
DaveS wrote:
> "Shawn Hirn" <srhi DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>> snip <
>> I own a very nice Canon lens. It is a Canon f2.8 24-70mm UL lens, for
>> which I paid something like $1,100 a year ago. That lens is great, but
>> it weighs a ton.
>>
>> The Canon XSi has an f3.518-35mm kit lens with image stabilization. I am
>> wondering if I would be better served by selling my 24-70mm Canon lens
>> and getting the kit lens with the XSi, or perhaps keep both lenses. The
>> strength of my 24-70mm lens is it has great optics, and its fast. I
>> also own a Canon f5.4 70-300mm lens, which I intend to keep.
>>
>> I like my 24-70mm lens, but it weighs too much to carry it around all
>> day, and it is very bulky, but I am not sure if that kit lens would be
>> as good, in terms of its optical quality, or do yo think most people
>> won't notice the difference anyway? With the IS capability of the XSI's
>> kit lens, it seems to me, that the major benefit of the f2.8 aperture of
>> my 24-70mm lens is no longer a big advantage, or am I wrong about that?
>>
>> I like to shoot photos of night scenes, so low light photography is
>> important to me. I am an amateur photographer with a limited budget, so
>> I am thinking I might be better off selling the 24-70mm lens to offset
>> the cost of buying the XSi.
>>
>> What do you think I should do?
>
> I would keep the good lens. It will help you build the biceps! :O)
>
> Seriously, I work under tight budget constraints also. If you already
> have the lens, and it's good glass, and it serves you well, there's no
> point in getting rid of it. You'll miss it when it's gone.
>
> An 18-35 isn't going to cover the same range as a 24-70. For a while I
> was missing the 55-100mm range when I bought my 20D. I found out I take
> a lot of photos in that range. I finally bought a Tamron 18-200 to fill
> in the gap. I have a 70-300 also, but it actaully starts at about 112mm.
>
> If you want the IS kit lens, then get the kit, but I don't think I would
> get rid of the good glass. I would love to get better glass than the
> Sigma 70-300 gives me, but it won't happen right now.
>
> If you already have the good glass keep it, because odds of scraping the
> money together later, may not be so high.
>
> And don't let your wife tease you about carrying the "manpurse" around
> everywhere. :O)
>
> Have fun,
> Dave
Why not keep both lenses for now, you can always sell one later.
Dave Cohen >> Stay informed about: To keep a Canon lens or not |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 353
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:34 am
Post subject: Re: To keep a Canon lens or not [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|