 |
|
 |
|
Next: Panasonic FZ7 Color Space
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Dec 03, 2006 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:36 pm
Post subject: Canon A620 Question Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
|
|
|
I just recently bought a Canon A620 digital camera and I have nothing
but good things to say about it. It doesn't get any better for the
price, $200 brand new. And for those complaining it doesn't take great
video, buy a video camera, this is a digital camera, if you want super
quality video, buy a nice dvd video camera...
Anyway, I was wondering if anyone has purchased the adapters and lens
attachments? I was considering it, but I've read that they can block
the viewfinder and the flash. The 52mm does a bit, but I was looking
at a 72mm tokina wide angle and telephoto lens which each come with the
adapter for the camera at a decent price. How much of a problem are
the lens attachments when using the viewfinder and more importantly the
flash?
Thanks,
Renee >> Stay informed about: Canon A620 Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 03, 2006 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 6:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Canon A620 Question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Thank you!
That's just the info I needed to know. I use the viewfinder a lot,
mostly because my hands aren't steady enough to take a good picture
using the LCD screen. The only time I use the LCD is when I use my
tripod. My main concern is blocking the flash too much.
I've been to the site you linked, that was where I was planning on
buying the adapter anyway. Thanks again for your help. >> Stay informed about: Canon A620 Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 3972
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 6:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Canon A620 Question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 3 Dec 2006 13:36:10 -0800, reneejj RemoveThis @gmail.com wrote:
> Anyway, I was wondering if anyone has purchased the adapters and lens
> attachments? I was considering it, but I've read that they can block
> the viewfinder and the flash. The 52mm does a bit, but I was looking
> at a 72mm tokina wide angle and telephoto lens which each come with the
> adapter for the camera at a decent price. How much of a problem are
> the lens attachments when using the viewfinder and more importantly the
> flash?
The only WA adapter I have is Fuji's, for their S5100. High
quality, but it does interfere with the built-in flash a bit. There
shouldn't be any problem using the viewfinder with the wide angle
adapter due to parallax problems, but with the telephoto adapter it
might be best to use the LCD display instead, or at least use it to
spot check the accuracy of the viewfinder's framing. If either of
the lens adapters blocks part of the viewfinder, it would be more of
an annoyance rather than a fatal defect, since it wouldn't block
part of the image on the sensor, only what you see through the
viewfinder, and that can be dealt with by using the LCD instead if
too much of the viewfinder's image is blocked. Even without a lens
adapter, the 620's framing through the viewfinder can be pretty
inaccurate with close subjects.
Yesterday I copied parts of a couple of messages from dpreview's
Canon forum that may be informative. I think that they were posted
about 3 months ago.
> =========================================
> You do have the specifications right, however I do not recommend the
> Canon lens adapter. It is made of plastic and I don't think it will hold up
> very well long term. I have it and when I purchased it I didn't know it was
> plastic, I recommend the lensmate adaptor, made of aluminum. See it at:
http://www.lensmateonline.com/newsite/A620A610.html
>
> They show pictures with the various lenses that are available for the A620,
> this is probably your best bet.
> ============================
> I own an A620 and a Raynox 6600 wide angle converter. When used for full
> wide, the image comes out with all corners slightly shaded. Besides, there is
> some limitations on the zoom range, not sharp throughout the whole zoom
> range. Apart from this, the converter works well with the lens adapter from
> Lensemate.
> ========================================= >> Stay informed about: Canon A620 Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 3972
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Canon A620 Question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 3 Dec 2006 18:45:36 -0800, reneejj.RemoveThis@gmail.com wrote:
> I've been to the site you linked, that was where I was planning on
> buying the adapter anyway. Thanks again for your help.
You're welcome. Got a new A620 myself yesterday, and I'll
probably soon be checking out lens adapters for it too. >> Stay informed about: Canon A620 Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 14, 2005 Posts: 187
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:35 am
Post subject: Re: Canon A620 Question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"ASAAR" <caught.DeleteThis@22.com> wrote in message
news:gb57n2tkefndb58i5l3l7b211ifc3n47kg@4ax.com...
> On 3 Dec 2006 18:45:36 -0800, reneejj.DeleteThis@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I've been to the site you linked, that was where I was planning on
>> buying the adapter anyway. Thanks again for your help.
>
> You're welcome. Got a new A620 myself yesterday, and I'll
> probably soon be checking out lens adapters for it too.
>
You both should like the A620. I have the similar A610 (5mp ver). Noise is
minimal at low ISOs. The newer high megapixel cameras have to use noise
reduction at low ISOs resulting in some NR artifacts. The lens is one of the
best ever used on a P&S digicam and battery life is amazing. Use the low
sharpening mode to reduce the annoying sharpening halos if it bothers you
(I'm allergic to fake sharpness. It makes me want to puke!).
Check ebay for the converter lenses. I found the good performing Tiffen
Megaplus lens (discontinued) for $10 from a reliable seller.
-S >> Stay informed about: Canon A620 Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 3972
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 8:46 am
Post subject: Re: Canon A620 Question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:35:07 -0500, SimonLW wrote:
> You both should like the A620. I have the similar A610 (5mp ver). Noise is
> minimal at low ISOs. The newer high megapixel cameras have to use noise
> reduction at low ISOs resulting in some NR artifacts. The lens is one of the
> best ever used on a P&S digicam and battery life is amazing.
I know. My Fuji S5100 has amazing battery life. But the A610 and
A620 have even more amazing battery life. When I first discovered
this, virtually everyone commenting on battery life said either that
only Li-Ion provided reasonable battery life, or that if AA cells
were used, alkalines couldn't be used, only NiMH could provide
decent battery life. Maybe the reason why this misinformation
continued so long is that the camera review websites were the last
to recognize the much greater efficiencies of newer cameras finally
make the use of alkalines practical. Then one by one, people using
an A610 or A620 would post messages say nearly the same thing,
something like "I've been using my first set of alkaline AA
batteries for 4 months and haven't had a low battery warning yet".
Also nice is that focusing is quick and accurate even if shooting
when there's very little available light. I recall reading that in
reviews, but it's still nice to experience it first hand.
> Use the low sharpening mode to reduce the annoying sharpening halos
> if it bothers you (I'm allergic to fake sharpness. It makes me want to puke!).
Sounds like a good idea. The A620 already has many more pixels
than my older camera (which has been sharp enough for me), so I
don't need to artificially simulate sharpness with the A620. >> Stay informed about: Canon A620 Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 16, 2006 Posts: 107
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:49 am
Post subject: Re: Canon A620 Question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 3972
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 5:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Canon A620 Question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:49:04 -0500, THO wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:35:07 -0500, SimonLW wrote:
>>> Use the low sharpening mode to reduce the annoying sharpening halos
>>> if it bothers you (I'm allergic to fake sharpness. It makes me want to
>>> puke!).
>>
>> Sounds like a good idea. The A620 already has many more pixels
>> than my older camera (which has been sharp enough for me), so I
>> don't need to artificially simulate sharpness with the A620.
>
> How do you adjust the sharpening mode to low?
I knew that I had seen it mentioned somewhere in the manual but
didn't know where. I found it in seconds by searching the PDF
manual looking for "sharpen". It's on page 58, where it says that
the setting is in the Func Menu's "Photo Effect Settings". Choices
there, and you can only choose one, are:
1. Effect Off
2. Vivid (color contrast and saturation)
3. Neutral (tones down contrast and color saturation)
4. Low Sharpening
5. Sepia
6. B/W >> Stay informed about: Canon A620 Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 16, 2006 Posts: 107
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Canon A620 Question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Canon choice - older A620 or newer A540? - In the UK at the moment the (seuperceded-by-the-a640) A620 is available at around £160 whereas the a540 is available at around £125 Tha main differences seem to be the display. The 620 has a 2", pull and twist, 115,000 pixel unit, where the A540 ...
Canon choice - older A620 or newer A540? - In the UK at the moment the (seuperceded-by-the-a640) A620 is available at around £160 whereas the a540 is available at around £125 Tha main differences seem to be the display. The 620 has a 2", pull and twist, 115,000 pixel unit, where the A540 ...
Canon choice - older A620 or newer A540? - In the UK at the moment the (seuperceded-by-the-a640) A620 is available at around £160 whereas the a540 is available at around £125 Tha main differences seem to be the display. The 620 has a 2", pull and twist, 115,000 pixel unit, where the A540 ...
Canon choice - older A620 or newer A540? - In the UK at the moment the (seuperceded-by-the-a640) A620 is available at around £160 whereas the a540 is available at around £125 Tha main differences seem to be the display. The 620 has a 2", pull and twist, 115,000 pixel unit, where the A540 ...
Canon 580/550 EX question - I've not yet located either manual, but in the meantime can anyone tell me if, when using the 550 EX as a slave (to a 580 EX), can I manually stop down the flash output while it's in slave mode? I've tried, but can't seem to get there. Or, if I put.. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|