Cannon Printers

You really are not a nice person--at least in the anonymity of the
Internet. One of the purposes of this forum is for people to seek
others' opinions. Your sarcasm helps no one and serves no purpose
other than to massage your apparently fragile ego.
Bill in Lake Charles
Helen wrote:
> "MP3ME" <mp3me.RemoveThis@snet.net> wrote in message
> news:m2ng82pmmclfiupknclhaombive8m4si87@4ax.com...
> > Has anyone seen any prints from the Cannon PIXMA Pro 9500 or the
> > PRO9000 printers? I currently have an Epson 2200 and R800 printers
> > and I am looking to upgrade. I have held off because the 2400 still
> > has some issues with gloss. Granted, there a lot better but not quite
> > there yet. I use the R800 for my glossy needs and the 2200 for
> > matte. I have been waiting for info on theses new printers, but
> > things have gotten quite. Any Word?
> >
>
> Have you considered that by typing "Cannon printers" into Google you might
> not get the info you are waiting for?
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

I bet you're beautiful when you're angry, as well
Helen wrote:
> "Bill K" <msuwkrull.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1149799690.746393.221290@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > You really are not a nice person--at least in the anonymity of the
> > Internet. One of the purposes of this forum is for people to seek
> > others' opinions. Your sarcasm helps no one and serves no purpose
> > other than to massage your apparently fragile ego.
> > Bill in Lake Charles
>
> Well, Bill in Lake Charles, wherever the hell that is, no sarcasm was
> intended. The OP needs to understand that by spelling Canon that way he
> simply isn't going to get the info he wants in the search engines.
> I'm not paid to be nice; I'm paid to take pictures, and I don't need to be
> nice to do so, and I certainly don't need to gain approval from people in
> Lake Charles, wherever the bloody hell it is, not that I particularly care.
>
>
> > Helen wrote:
> >> "MP3ME" <mp3me.RemoveThis@snet.net> wrote in message
> >> news:m2ng82pmmclfiupknclhaombive8m4si87@4ax.com...
> >> > Has anyone seen any prints from the Cannon PIXMA Pro 9500 or the
> >> > PRO9000 printers? I currently have an Epson 2200 and R800 printers
> >> > and I am looking to upgrade. I have held off because the 2400 still
> >> > has some issues with gloss. Granted, there a lot better but not quite
> >> > there yet. I use the R800 for my glossy needs and the 2200 for
> >> > matte. I have been waiting for info on theses new printers, but
> >> > things have gotten quite. Any Word?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Have you considered that by typing "Cannon printers" into Google you
> >> might
> >> not get the info you are waiting for?
> >
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

Helen wrote:
> "Bill K" <msuwkrull.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1149799690.746393.221290@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > You really are not a nice person--at least in the anonymity of the
> > Internet. One of the purposes of this forum is for people to seek
> > others' opinions. Your sarcasm helps no one and serves no purpose
> > other than to massage your apparently fragile ego.
> > Bill in Lake Charles
>
> Well, Bill in Lake Charles, wherever the hell that is, no sarcasm was
> intended. The OP needs to understand that by spelling Canon that way he
> simply isn't going to get the info he wants in the search engines.
> I'm not paid to be nice; I'm paid to take pictures, and I don't need to be
> nice to do so, and I certainly don't need to gain approval from people in
> Lake Charles, wherever the bloody hell it is, not that I particularly care.
>
Wow, another "hate-myself" impolite, ill-mannered and boorish net
psycho. I entered here because I was iterested in Bill's well
intentioned question. Mistake.

Yes you do need to be nice. And by your apparent faux-bravado approach
it obvious to anyone that you do seek approval. Most people with your
unsolicited churlish behavior *are* hanging by the thread of a very
fragile ego. You don't need to act stupid. Show a little respect to
others and, who knows, your "pictures" that you are "paid" to "take"
just might improve.
And if you knew *anything* you'd know about Lake Charles. Wake up Helen
the world is full of enough nasty and repugnant people, get a grip.
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

"MP3ME" <mp3me RemoveThis @snet.net> wrote in message
news:m2ng82pmmclfiupknclhaombive8m4si87@4ax.com...
> Has anyone seen any prints from the Cannon PIXMA Pro 9500 or the
> PRO9000 printers? I currently have an Epson 2200 and R800 printers
> and I am looking to upgrade. I have held off because the 2400 still
> has some issues with gloss. Granted, there a lot better but not quite
> there yet. I use the R800 for my glossy needs and the 2200 for
> matte. I have been waiting for info on theses new printers, but
> things have gotten quite. Any Word?
>

Have you considered that by typing "Cannon printers" into Google you might
not get the info you are waiting for?
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

The gloss optimizer system used in Epson dye based printers is more than
adequate. I use both a 1280 and an 1800 and comparing glossy prints side by
side it is not the glossiness of the print finish that anyone would notice
as distinguishing the prints.
If you move to Canon printers you are entering a new world of color
management headaches due to the nature of Canon printer drivers and the
marked limitation of their canned paper profiles: basically just glossy and
matte, as those are the only paper surfaces Canon markets. My experience
with inkbased Canon printers is that even low cost custom profile systems,
like the Moncaco Optix XR, yield far superior profiles to what Canon ships
with their printers.
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

My apologies for the misspelling of the company name as appose to the
item that makes a large bang. I didn't realize there were so many
English majors on line. Sometimes you really need to proof read as
appose to letting spell check catch it for you.


On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:36:29 GMT, MP3ME <mp3me RemoveThis @snet.net> wrote:

>Has anyone seen any prints from the Cannon PIXMA Pro 9500 or the
>PRO9000 printers? I currently have an Epson 2200 and R800 printers
>and I am looking to upgrade. I have held off because the 2400 still
>has some issues with gloss. Granted, there a lot better but not quite
>there yet. I use the R800 for my glossy needs and the 2200 for
>matte. I have been waiting for info on theses new printers, but
>things have gotten quite. Any Word?
>
>Thanks
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:36:29 GMT, MP3ME <mp3me.TakeThisOut@snet.net> wrote:

> Has anyone seen any prints from the Cannon PIXMA Pro 9500 or the
> PRO9000 printers? I currently have an Epson 2200 and R800 printers
> and I am looking to upgrade. I have held off because the 2400 still
> has some issues with gloss. Granted, there a lot better but not quite
> there yet. I use the R800 for my glossy needs and the 2200 for
> matte. I have been waiting for info on theses new printers, but
> things have gotten quite. Any Word?

Cannon only make exploding products.
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:59:17 +0100, Helen wrote:

>
> "MP3ME" <mp3me RemoveThis @snet.net> wrote in message
> news:m2ng82pmmclfiupknclhaombive8m4si87@4ax.com...
>> Has anyone seen any prints from the Cannon PIXMA Pro 9500 or the
>> PRO9000 printers? I currently have an Epson 2200 and R800 printers
>> and I am looking to upgrade. I have held off because the 2400 still
>> has some issues with gloss. Granted, there a lot better but not quite
>> there yet. I use the R800 for my glossy needs and the 2200 for
>> matte. I have been waiting for info on theses new printers, but
>> things have gotten quite. Any Word?
>>
>
> Have you considered that by typing "Cannon printers" into Google you might
> not get the info you are waiting for?
Could get fired for doing that.
--
Neil
Delete 'l' for address.
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

got pix helen?

"Bill K" <msuwkrull.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149809372.010064.229330@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>I bet you're beautiful when you're angry, as well
> Helen wrote:
>> "Bill K" <msuwkrull.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1149799690.746393.221290@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> > You really are not a nice person--at least in the anonymity of the
>> > Internet. One of the purposes of this forum is for people to seek
>> > others' opinions. Your sarcasm helps no one and serves no purpose
>> > other than to massage your apparently fragile ego.
>> > Bill in Lake Charles
>>
>> Well, Bill in Lake Charles, wherever the hell that is, no sarcasm was
>> intended. The OP needs to understand that by spelling Canon that way he
>> simply isn't going to get the info he wants in the search engines.
>> I'm not paid to be nice; I'm paid to take pictures, and I don't need to
>> be
>> nice to do so, and I certainly don't need to gain approval from people in
>> Lake Charles, wherever the bloody hell it is, not that I particularly
>> care.
>>
>>
>> > Helen wrote:
>> >> "MP3ME" <mp3me.RemoveThis@snet.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:m2ng82pmmclfiupknclhaombive8m4si87@4ax.com...
>> >> > Has anyone seen any prints from the Cannon PIXMA Pro 9500 or the
>> >> > PRO9000 printers? I currently have an Epson 2200 and R800 printers
>> >> > and I am looking to upgrade. I have held off because the 2400 still
>> >> > has some issues with gloss. Granted, there a lot better but not
>> >> > quite
>> >> > there yet. I use the R800 for my glossy needs and the 2200 for
>> >> > matte. I have been waiting for info on theses new printers, but
>> >> > things have gotten quite. Any Word?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Have you considered that by typing "Cannon printers" into Google you
>> >> might
>> >> not get the info you are waiting for?
>> >
>
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

"Bill K" <msuwkrull.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149799690.746393.221290@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> You really are not a nice person--at least in the anonymity of the
> Internet. One of the purposes of this forum is for people to seek
> others' opinions. Your sarcasm helps no one and serves no purpose
> other than to massage your apparently fragile ego.
> Bill in Lake Charles

Well, Bill in Lake Charles, wherever the hell that is, no sarcasm was
intended. The OP needs to understand that by spelling Canon that way he
simply isn't going to get the info he wants in the search engines.
I'm not paid to be nice; I'm paid to take pictures, and I don't need to be
nice to do so, and I certainly don't need to gain approval from people in
Lake Charles, wherever the bloody hell it is, not that I particularly care.


> Helen wrote:
>> "MP3ME" <mp3me.DeleteThis@snet.net> wrote in message
>> news:m2ng82pmmclfiupknclhaombive8m4si87@4ax.com...
>> > Has anyone seen any prints from the Cannon PIXMA Pro 9500 or the
>> > PRO9000 printers? I currently have an Epson 2200 and R800 printers
>> > and I am looking to upgrade. I have held off because the 2400 still
>> > has some issues with gloss. Granted, there a lot better but not quite
>> > there yet. I use the R800 for my glossy needs and the 2200 for
>> > matte. I have been waiting for info on theses new printers, but
>> > things have gotten quite. Any Word?
>> >
>>
>> Have you considered that by typing "Cannon printers" into Google you
>> might
>> not get the info you are waiting for?
>
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

Well-stated. I submit, though, that she is beautiful when she is angry
Bill in Lake Charles

nizo1 DeleteThis @verizon.net wrote:
> Helen wrote:
> > "Bill K" <msuwkrull DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1149799690.746393.221290@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > You really are not a nice person--at least in the anonymity of the
> > > Internet. One of the purposes of this forum is for people to seek
> > > others' opinions. Your sarcasm helps no one and serves no purpose
> > > other than to massage your apparently fragile ego.
> > > Bill in Lake Charles
> >
> > Well, Bill in Lake Charles, wherever the hell that is, no sarcasm was
> > intended. The OP needs to understand that by spelling Canon that way he
> > simply isn't going to get the info he wants in the search engines.
> > I'm not paid to be nice; I'm paid to take pictures, and I don't need to be
> > nice to do so, and I certainly don't need to gain approval from people in
> > Lake Charles, wherever the bloody hell it is, not that I particularly care.
> >
> Wow, another "hate-myself" impolite, ill-mannered and boorish net
> psycho. I entered here because I was iterested in Bill's well
> intentioned question. Mistake.
>
> Yes you do need to be nice. And by your apparent faux-bravado approach
> it obvious to anyone that you do seek approval. Most people with your
> unsolicited churlish behavior *are* hanging by the thread of a very
> fragile ego. You don't need to act stupid. Show a little respect to
> others and, who knows, your "pictures" that you are "paid" to "take"
> just might improve.
> And if you knew *anything* you'd know about Lake Charles. Wake up Helen
> the world is full of enough nasty and repugnant people, get a grip.
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers 

Well, she is quite intriguing. I have a sense that underneath all that
foul-tempered bravado is a fragile, intelligent, sensitive buttery just
waiting to burst the cocoon of the defensive wall she has built to
protect herself.

Hey, I admit it--I'm a BSer supreme. After all, I am in public
relations
Bill in Lake Charles
J. Clarke wrote:
> nizo1.RemoveThis@verizon.net wrote:
>
> >
> > Helen wrote:
> >> "Bill K" <msuwkrull.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1149799690.746393.221290@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> > You really are not a nice person--at least in the anonymity of the
> >> > Internet. One of the purposes of this forum is for people to seek
> >> > others' opinions. Your sarcasm helps no one and serves no purpose
> >> > other than to massage your apparently fragile ego.
> >> > Bill in Lake Charles
> >>
> >> Well, Bill in Lake Charles, wherever the hell that is, no sarcasm was
> >> intended. The OP needs to understand that by spelling Canon that way he
> >> simply isn't going to get the info he wants in the search engines.
> >> I'm not paid to be nice; I'm paid to take pictures, and I don't need to
> >> be nice to do so, and I certainly don't need to gain approval from people
> >> in Lake Charles, wherever the bloody hell it is, not that I particularly
> >> care.
> >>
> > Wow, another "hate-myself" impolite, ill-mannered and boorish net
> > psycho. I entered here because I was iterested in Bill's well
> > intentioned question. Mistake.
> >
> > Yes you do need to be nice. And by your apparent faux-bravado approach
> > it obvious to anyone that you do seek approval. Most people with your
> > unsolicited churlish behavior *are* hanging by the thread of a very
> > fragile ego. You don't need to act stupid. Show a little respect to
> > others and, who knows, your "pictures" that you are "paid" to "take"
> > just might improve.
> > And if you knew *anything* you'd know about Lake Charles. Wake up Helen
> > the world is full of enough nasty and repugnant people, get a grip.
>
> While she might have phrased it more gently, her advice to spell the name
> correctly is sound. If one is searching for information and using a
> misspelled keyword one will seldom find what one is looking for. There is
> a lot of information about Canon printers out there, if one spells "Canon"
> properly.
>
> As for the rest, are you trying to flirt with her?
>
> --
> --John
> to email, dial "usenet" and validate
> (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
 >> Stay informed about: Cannon Printers