"MichaelM" <directlyover.RemoveThis@centreofearth.com> wrote in message
news:i6udnUz3fYrFBOnYRVnyiQ@eclipse.net.uk...
>
> My sentiments too. I have felt the so called "unprofessional" 400D,
> and
> didn't have the hand pains etc. that are allegedly this camera's
> undoing.
> Once you know how to hold the camera properly, there is no
> significant issue
> regarding the so-called ergonomics of the 400D. I suppose that if
> you can't
> belittle its image quality or its functionality, then the ergonomics
> /
> subjective thinking is the only avenue left. For over 100 quid
> cheaper than
> the D80, that viewfinder of the D80 is a very expenive bit of glass!
Since I have owned both the Rebel XT/350D and Nikon D80, I believe I'm
somewhat qualified to comment on this topic.
The Canon has great image quality, no one will deny that, and it's the
reason I bought it over the $500 more expensive (at the time) 20D
model. At first I liked the smaller size and lightweight, but as I
used the camera more and more, and with larger lenses, the handling
and ergonomics started to take a toll. I have a pro friend who uses
Nikon, and after borrowing his D70s one day, I realized again that
handling makes a big difference, at least to a frequent user like
myself.
After a short while, I grew to dislike the small grip on the little
Rebel series. At first I thought it was just the ergonomics of the
Nikon - my finger fell right on the shutter button, and using the
control dials was easier and more logical. But then I pulled out my
trusty old Canon 3 and Elan IIe to sell, and when checking them out, I
realized what I had been missing with the tiny Rebel - comfortable
handling.
So nearly two years later when a friend showed interest in my Canon XT
gear, and bought it all, I couldn't resist. I jumped all over the
Nikon D80 with its larger viewfinder, better handling, better
ergonomics, more features, more direct controls, faster response time,
better flash system, better LCD display, more customization, and so
on.
The difference isn't just the viewfinder - it's like the difference
between a consumer camera and a semi-pro model that feels right. I'm
not knocking the XT/i models, they take great pictures and have a lot
to offer in a small reasonably priced package. Heck, Canon still has a
slight edge in silky smooth image quality, even at ISO 100, although
the Nikon is no slouch.
But if you're more advanced than a casual user looking to move into
SLR territory, the Nikon D80 has a LOT more to offer than just a nice
viewfinder. It's the camera I wanted two years ago when I moved to
digital, but my choices were limited back then. Today it's a different
story, and the D80 is what I would recommend to anyone who doesn't
already own Canon lenses.
Of course, that's just me. YMMV.
>> Stay informed about: Which Camera?