John Navas <spamfilt... DeleteThis @navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
> He's now admitted that his P&S is "pretty old" so that
> probably has something to do with it.
John's still "wasting his time" by trolling wtih indirect responses.
The P&S is indeed three years old, but it is still doing its job just
fine, so I have no particular reason to replace it.
The reason why I mentioned its age at all is to dislose that I'm
simply not actively in the marketplace right now researching every new
bleeding edge feature, so a few vendors with something different are
expected to have been overlooked.
Yet I have been still paying attention well enough to those changes
that I consider most important. For example, I've already recognized
that some P&S vendors have dramatically improved shutter lag.
However, based on some of the features that my old P&S has that newer
P&S's do not, I'm not in any hurry to replace it.
-hh
>> Stay informed about: Best Camera for NIght Shots?